The EU debate - Part III

[DMD]

You must log in or register to see media

 

[NSIS]

They threatened to send her to Crimea in response. She no longer works for RT.
She was hired because she was a 9/11 conspiracy loon.

 

[DMD]

Another alt-right link? It's 50 minutes long and it's from another conspiracy loon.
How many people do you expect to watch that? Have you even watched it?

Yep, I watched it. Contrary to the blubbering classes, I watch all the ones I post.

 

[PleaseNotPoll]

Yep, I watched it. Contrary to the blubbering classes, I watch all the ones I post.

And what insights did it provide?

 

[DMD]

They threatened to send her to Crimea in response. She no longer works for RT.
She was hired because she was a 9/11 conspiracy loon.

Check out her version. AS she no longer works for them, if your version's accurate, she has no need to lie.

 

[DMD]

And what insights did it provide?

That some people's replies provide a living example of confirmation bias.

 

[Archers Road]

Yep, I watched it. Contrary to the blubbering classes, I watch all the ones I post.

No wonder you are incapable of coherent thought; you've permanently warped your mind with that garbage.

 

[PleaseNotPoll]

That some people's replies provide a living example of confirmation bias.

So yet another example of you posted a crap video from loons and failing to comment on it?
Plus ca change.

 

[DMD]

So yet another example of you posted a crap video from loons and failing to comment on it?
Plus ca change.

And yet again, you comment without even watching it because of your narrow minded prejudice.

Plus ca change in deed.

 

[DMD]

No wonder you are incapable of coherent thought; you've permanently warped your mind with that garbage.

You watched it?

 

[PleaseNotPoll]

And yet again, you comment without even watching it because of your narrow minded prejudice.

Plus ca change in deed.

It's not narrow-minded prejudice to ignore a 50 minute video being used in lieu of an argument.
You can't even offer a decent reason to watch it or any insights from it.

Your endless projection's embarrassing.

 

[NSIS]

You watched it?

No, and neither did you, you old bullshitter!...

 

[steveninaster1]

It's not all state owned and sponsored, with virtually no dissenting voices allowed, though.

I find RT very useful for news, just not when it's discussing Russian foreign relations.

 

[DMD]

No, and neither did you, you old bullshitter!...

You do have a habit of thinking you know people better than they know themselves.

You also have a habit of being wrong, as well as a habit of posting silly abuse.

 

[DMD]

It's not narrow-minded prejudice to ignore a 50 minute video being used in lieu of an argument.
You can't even offer a decent reason to watch it or any insights from it.

Your endless projection's embarrassing.

It really is narrow minded to comment on something you never watched purely because you're prejudiced.

To try to claim other wise and to still comment on it is ridiculous and foolish.

 

[PleaseNotPoll]

It really is narrow minded to comment on something you never watched purely because you're prejudiced.

To try to claim other wise and to still comment on it is ridiculous and foolish.

I didn't comment on the content, so your rant is utter nonsense.
Neither have you, as usual.

 

[NSIS]

You do have a habit of thinking you know people better than they know themselves.

You also have a habit of being wrong, as well as a habit of posting silly abuse.

Well, if you watched it (you didn't), then you'll have no trouble commenting on it and answering any questions, will you?...

 

[DMD]

I find RT very useful for news, just not when it's discussing Russian foreign relations.

Likewise. I watch a lot of foreign channels, and try to determine the reality that often falls between the versions. I certainly wouldn't rely solely on the western mainstream media.

It amazes me how many people do, given the easy access to a wider view. Watching a channel doesn't mean you support it. Football fans watch an opposition team, and seek out the opposition fans view, they don't support them though.

 

[DMD]

I didn't comment on the content, so your rant is utter nonsense.
Neither have you, as usual.

You commented on the video, it was limited to the source, but you've still droned on showing your pride in your ignorant prejudice.

 

[DMD]

Well, if you watched it (you didn't), then you'll have no trouble commenting on it and answering any questions, will you?...

You'd have to watch to ask questions. Unless you're another that revels in prejudice and ignorance. I know which way my bet would go.

Why do fools assume posting an alternative view somehow means you support it?