So repeating your position is deflectory?
It looks like there's another on the list of misunderstood words on here.![]()
Yak, yak, yak..
Blah, blah, blah.
Still saying nothing, as per...
So repeating your position is deflectory?
It looks like there's another on the list of misunderstood words on here.![]()
17 minus 6 = 11This is where we will disagree, prime factor for 6 million absolutely, deciding factor, sorry no.
Provide the proof and I will concede. At the moment I seem to be the only one who understands basic maths, where 17 is greater than 6.

It's not a fact, it's just your opinion.
It's a fact that Tories made an election pledge to get immigration down to 10's of thousands.
It's a fact that non EU immigration currently sits way beyond that level
It's a fact that they've committed to lowering that level
It's a fact that they've changed the entry criteria to make it harder for non EU citizens to enter the UK
It's a fact that Farage is a disingenuous ****![]()

Yak, yak, yak..
Blah, blah, blah.
Still saying nothing, as per...
That combination of facts completely backs up my view on non EU immigration numbers, you thick wooden top.It's a fact that none of them are what was being argued by stuttering stumpy.![]()

That combination of facts completely backs up my view on non EU immigration numbers, you thick wooden top.![]()
That's one of biggest piles of ****e you've ever posted, and there's plenty of competition for that accoladePerhaps, but that's an argument you're having with someone else stumpy.
You've jumped into stuttering blethering on to me. In that context, your 'facts' are just meaningless pap.![]()
That's one of biggest piles of ****e you've ever posted, and there's plenty of competition for that accolade
Your memory is ****e due to your age Grandad, and you appear to have forgotten the discussion we were having about non EU immigration and you calling my post opinion and not fact. I've given you the facts that back up that opinion.
Go google if Nige got snookered with the same, when he trotted out the same pile of ****e on the same subject.

He backed his argument and it's a discussion forum, not a private chat, hence my posts.You linked it into a discussion between stuttering and me, where he's claiming facts, and I pointed out he's made none that back his position.
If you reckon your post was meant to be about some other subject, you ****ed up your reply you dim dwarf.
The fact you're down to attempts like this, just highlights the fact you're going for your usual tactic of shifting it to tedious and childish personal abuse because your initial diversion from the banks has failed and your secondary argument has fallen out of your arse.
It didn't have far to fall though did it wee man.![]()
He backed his argument and it's a discussion forum, not a private chat, hence my posts.
You've had your arse handed to you yet again, after parroting the words of yet another right wing conman.
In a fit of temper after being owned again, you've now posted that utter nonsense.
The temerity of you bleating about personal abuse in a post that includes the word dwarf is hilarious in its idiocy.
I'm 5ft 10" btw, so if that's dwarf size you must live in the land of the giants wooden top.

What a load of desperate bollocks. Definite little man syndrome stuff.
You can't seem to make your mind up. Were those 'facts' to support stuttering now (they don't btw) ? A minute or two back you were trying to claim they were backing some other supposed argument.
You must log in or register to see images
Go and find some more right wing conspiracy theories that you can link, not pass comment on and spend a day making snide comments when people rip them to shreds
You boring, snide, auld prick
Oh the irony.
Given your desperation to be "right" rather than having a conversation, you get your arse handed back to you almost every time, and today's no exception.
I was right when I suggested you're down to personal 'abuse' by way of a diversion. You do it time and again little fella. You've added the other one of making ridiculous claims in the hope some fool believes you.
Your main contribution seems to be to jump in and **** up discussions. You seem terrified that people may just agree and your whining is seen for exactly what it is.![]()
Oh the irony.
You've been dry humped again, and no amount of your delusional victory celebrations can hide the reality.
My advice would be to research the words you parrot before posting them, it'll save you a lot of embarrassment
Perhaps, but that's an argument you're having with someone else stumpy.
You've jumped into stuttering blethering on to me. In that context, your 'facts' are just meaningless pap.![]()
You boring old twat. I totally destroyed your argument about increased immigration from Southern asía
But, no, as usual, off you go on one of your long, meandering, deflection loaded diatribes, basically saying **** all.
I used a link to comments by people from South East Asia, but it was a general comment about the divisive nature of the current border policy. Your post didn't 'destroy' it, it highlighted this discrimination. You posted that article to try and destroy the idea that xenophobia was the prime driver for BrexitI used a link to comments by people from South East Asia, but it was a general comment about the divisive nature of the current border policy. Your post didn't 'destroy' it, it highlighted this discrimination.
You're as bad as the midget for arguing rather than conversing, losing but trying to claim victory when you've done no such thing.
Why not join people in conversation, because you're ****e at your own daft game.![]()

You posted that article to try and destroy the idea that xenophobia was the prime driver for Brexit
Only it backed the claim that xenophobia drove the result, as they were moaning a bucket load about the Eastern Europeans you thick ****![]()
