The EU debate - Part III

There wasn't even an insult in that post. Enjoy beating up the wife.

 

The worrying thing is, she's not alone. Some of those who potentially could go on to govern us, across all parties, seem to be spectacular stupid.

 

You should see him trying to walk and chew gum at the same time

 

Always focused on Stan. Good lad

I bet you put a burqa on your kick bag.

 

Ask the Tories, it was a group of Tories who said it.

 

Boris Johnson says:
"The Prime Minister has been very clear what we have been trying to do. Brexit gives us a chance to:
take back control of our borders,
take back control of quite large sums of money,
not to be run by the European Court (so not to have EU law in this country),
and fourthly, to be able to do free trade deals.
Within those four ideas is a wealth of information.
That is all you need to know to understand the very exciting agenda the Prime Minister has for Brexit"

 

In other words, we still haven't got a ****ing clue what we're doing. But these soundbites are meant to assure you that we do. Trust me.

Yeah rightho, Boris!...


He's right about one thing, it's going to be exciting. Just not in the way that he's trying to make it sound.,...

 

Johnson has cottoned on to the fact that he can suck in the simple with non statements like that. I suspect Pete has a picture of him on all of his fridges.

 

The same Boris Johnosn who said the other day, we'd be paying into the EU to retain our single market access?

That cloth head should be put out to grass. The complete fraud.

 

@dull

 

That would be the Boris who in May this year said “In favour of staying, it is in Britain’s geo-strategic interests to be pretty intimately engaged in the doings of a continent that has a grim 20th-century history, and whose agonies have caused millions of Britons to lose their lives.”

 

Surely you can't be hinting at hypocrisy from Boris? or being mealy mouthed?...

 

For the record, and for the removal of any further doubt, I think Boris is an unprincipled self serving ****-bag who would say and do anything to serve his own interests. Apologies if this opinion is a bit ambiguous.

 

Funnily enough, those were my exact thoughts too...

 

Have you seen the video at the end of the article?....Which side of the argument appears to be the most ill informed, ignorant, monosyllabic and quite frankly embarrassing?...you decide

http://video.dailymail.co.uk/video/...2169106141/640x360_MP4_271061872169106141.mp4

 

I'm not really interested in this debate.

Whatever it is, I don't think putting up a daily mail link, is going to do you any favours.

 

Don't bother commenting if you can't be arsed to watch the video...

 

I'll comment on what I want, when I want.

Who the **** are you to tell me otherwise?