The EU debate - Part III

Adding another unsupported claim doesn't make the other claim any more credible. It just highlights that you're avoiding supporting the original one.

 

You got ****ed off when I rightly called Le Pen a racist and a fascist, and spent pages trying to say she was neither

Happy to help

 

So you'll have no problem posting a link to a post of me saying that she wasn't racist or fascist.

Off you pop.

Perhaps you could explain how that claim relates to the one at hand, which is "You just get annoyed when someone says something that's blatantly racist and they're correctly called a racist."

 

He was the one who brought up other religions first.

What do you think she's going to do exactly? Shut down all the shops on a Sunday? Outlaw sex before marriage? It's not as bizarre as you're trying to make it out to be, I'm more surprised that people haven't seen it as nothing more than an appeal to old Christians. And if she is genuine, then it's an obvious point that she's making, hence the phoney outrage.

 

I can't be arsed digging it out, to appease you I'm afraid.

You've continually defended right wing racists throughout this entire debate, from Le Pen to Trump.

But of course you're not a racist, and I'd never suggest nor intimate such a thing, I just find your motives somewhat odd.

 

So it's bollocks like the other claims then. Thought so.

 

Her comment was in relation to Brexit so your sarcastic comments there are moot.

I've no idea what she's going to do, and patently neither does she, hence the divine intervention suggestion I suppose.

I'm not outraged either petal, I just think it was a poorly advised comment

 

Nope and you know it, I'm not wasting ages trawling a thread so that you can then use some form of pedantic bollocks and deflection to try and deny the obvious. You're really not that important love.

 

Nope, you're simply trying to dig your mate out of a hole. I've stuck to the same issue throughout, and included the question at hand, no pedantics or diversions, at least not from me.

"You just get annoyed when someone says something that's blatantly racist and they're correctly called a racist."

You've just added some other bullshit that you can't support and that doesn't address the question either.

 

please log in to view this image

Say hello to the brexit plan

 

I saw that. Hilarious. They're still "brainstorming" and they've got some intern scribbling down notes for them to argue over tomorrow.

Rule Britannia!

 

Why is it a bad thing to mention that you look towards your faith and what it teaches to help you make the right decision?

 

http://thefreethoughtproject.com/20-million-muslims-march-against-isis/

 

If your decision is something that affects you alone - **** all

If the context is the terms of the deal that will form the biggest decision since WWII for this country - ****ing everything

 

Right, so again, what do you think she's going to do exactly?

 

Not a lot based on current form. Lots of sound bites and nervous head nodding but I suspect she'll achieve close to the square root of **** all before the next election. She's scared of her own shadow.

 

Try and appease her own far right loons and the xenophobes in the populous, whilst trying to avoid torching the economy in the process

On her performance so far, I reckon she'll end up tossing a coin whilst saying a Hail Mary

 

Interesting. And how does this relate to her faiths?

 

It depends what the voices in her head are telling her that day.

 

The voices say, to close down all safe spaces, thats you ****ed then