The EU debate - Part III

Evening bananas
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/p...s-tirade-theresa-may-article-50-a7395466.html

 

I watched it live, did you?

Silly question I know

 

Do you seriously expect me to plough through pages of the drivel and diversion that you, stuttering and that other arsehole whose name escapes me post, to find a comment I made that you ignored at the time? Knackers to that. All you're doing is confirming what I put about you earlier.

Every now and again, you post some interesting and informative stuff, but you shroud it amongst so much ****e, it gets missed. The odd time I've found it and responded, your replies are littered with nonsense and deflection, and make it worthless bothering.

This brashness and abuse just looks like you're afraid to have your opinions examined. That's not a strength, it's a sign of insecurity.

 

There are more brains in a meat pie than in this man

 

And you'd know banana

 

Come on, Dull, surely you can do better than that?..

Or maybe you can't!....

 

Bizarre. Not sure who I've copied with that post. Still, you've got a like off Kustard and God's Cock so you must be right.

 

I have not watched QT for years, it really is dreadful now

 

Says the man who continually dodges straightforward questions and is doing so yet again with a yet another nonsense deflection post. Oooohhhhh the irony.

You can't answer the question, I get it, let's leave it there

 

TBF I can't disagree with you on that. I don't normally watch it anymore, but did last night and the quality of the panel was ****e.

One of the Fun loving criminals ffs!

 

All this brought to you by the the Supreme maestro of diversions, distractions, obfuscations, and posting general meaningless bollocks!

Laughable, so I will....

 

It was answered, you're simply confirming what I put about you.

There's an easy way to prove me wrong, just post like an adult and my claim fizzles away.

Are you up to the challenge?

 

I'll combine your replies to reduce clutter.

Hmmm, now what could be missing from them both?

 

Bizarre? Bluey? Get it.

 

You didn't answer my question at all. Instead you've spent 2 pages arguing that you answered it in a post before I asked it (which you won't or can't reference) and have been taking pops at my posting style whilst moaning that it's somehow my fault because my question was barbed when it wasn't in the slightest.

If you want a discussion then we can have a sensible discussion, if you want to avoid your viewpoint being challenged then do us both a favour and do a Pete and hit the ignore button.

 

It was clear she was worked up and trying to make a valid point about the effect on research. It's a shame that her point has been lost in all this as it was very relevant

 

He's a conundrum. He went to the LSE. His views on Brexit are spot on.

But he's worked for the Daily Fascist and the Express.

 

Fail 1.

Please try again.

 

Saw this older article when reading the Banana article. The video clip of the classic clueless Leaver is funny.

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/u...take-back-control-eu-referendum-a7356806.html

 

I won't bother, you're not worth the effort.

Your constant squirming and deflection tactics are as Dull as ****, I find you extremely weary, which is a shame, as I don't think you're a stupid man at all, and whilst I think your views are somewhat odd, that doesn't mean we couldn't have a sensible discussion.