The EU debate - Part III

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
It could be improved, some southerners still turn up. It's partly due to the University having a high retention rate. Do you realise how childish comments like that make you look?

Still, at least it avoids discussing the Institute of Directors comments.


Not the Institute of Directors, but I see your point. Whether to debate some right wing "think" tank's unsubstantiated projections with possibly the internet's most boring bastard, or....
...continue to make childish remarks...choices...
 
Not the Institute of Directors, but I see your point. Whether to debate some right wing "think" tank's unsubstantiated projections with possibly the internet's most boring bastard, or....
...continue to make childish remarks...choices...
Not the Institute of Directors, but I see your point. Whether to debate some right wing "think" tank's unsubstantiated projections with possibly the internet's most boring bastard, or....
...continue to make childish remarks...choices...

Aye, it's best that you recognise your limitations, and aspire to remain childish. <ok>
 
You'd have to ask Pete.

I'm sure they know lots but GDP is one small part of the story. GDP could theoretically go up 10% in a year and still leave us a poorer country at the end of it.


Or I could just read their opinion, which seems to be a positive one.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.