You divvy, I said several times that I'd checked nothing, so how can I post numbers or comparisons?
I thought it was a bit obvious that the one percentage I did post was totally made up. The clues were there, but you were too dim. I can't believe a numbers expert was ridiculous enough to see it any other way.
You really are one of the most ridiculous people I've come across on the forums. Congratulations.![]()
You ****wit!
You still think you can hide yourself and your bigoted opinions behind your vague suggestions.
I don't check every figure. I credit anybody with a tenth of a brain to have checked their figures before they present them as facts in a serious debate. Clearly you're short of this one tenth then!
The figures were irrelevant, anyway!
And, you are so thick, or think you're so clever, that you can keep prattling on about your figures - correct or not - and deflect your way past the real point that was being made. Your ridiculous attempt to make a comparison between the moral standards of criminals and the far higher ones that are incumbent upon the state.
Your figures, fictional or not, we're not the point. All your idiotic attempts at deflection ( yet again!) won't let you escape.
I've wasted more than enough of my time on you and you're pathetic attempts to be clever.
You find me and my opinions ridiculous? Pal, I've got news for you - virtually the whole forum finds you ridiculous!. Not that I expect that to penetrate your thick skull.

