So what is your line of work then?
Why is that relevant?
So what is your line of work then?
. I think he's finally flipped'
And, that's not sensible!...
What? Like you said you would leave?What and miss your rants...yet again you are applying a label to me (incompetent), when you know nothing about me. You do understand that I, like you, can multitask on a PC and it's quite possible that I could be completing work whilst engaging with you?
As it happens, I will be disappearing soon because I'm going out to dinner. Please do not mistake my absence as any kind of victory for you.
As for the impressing part, there are pages and pages of your attempts to try to impress people on this site. Unfortunately, other than a little bit of support from custard, you have failed miserably.
I hope people are laughing at me and I am in some small way making there day more enjoyable.
I am happy to continue with these childish outbursts for as long as you like, because unlike you, I don't take myself too seriously and think that I am the font of all knowledge.
So here's a thought, when you stop being a complete prat, so will I.
I didn't advocate that. I didn't even know you were a prisoner. What were you imprisoned for?
By the way ... did you know the nutter version of Peter Saxton not only wants prisoners to run around on giant hamster wheels but wants ALL 12 yr old children to be COMPULSORY made to use contraception...hard to believe some one could be that stupid really.
What Peter Saxton. I don't see anything saying this blog is written by Peter Saxton.Sorry...I have obviously mistaken you for this Peter Saxton of The Sensible Party who has this blog of his party's policies.
http://thesensibleparty.blogspot.co.uk/2005/04/prison-population-policy.html?m=1
I haven't been to prison (couldn't get to do my job if I had) so it's kind of lucky that that no one realises that Lee Harvey Oswald was my patsy.
You are simply lying. I don't know of any Peter Saxton that is saying that. Can you justify your lies?By the way ... did you know the nutter version of Peter Saxton not only wants prisoners to run around on giant hamster wheels but wants ALL 12 yr old children to be COMPULSORY made to use contraception...hard to believe some one could be that stupid really.
I don't give a **** what you think. Obviously you are too stupid to understand any reality.It is unbelievable. But equally unbelievable is this Peter Saxons defence that the blog in question is nothing to do with his Sensible Party, and that founded a political party called the Sensible Party with.... no policies or manifesto whatsoever!
I understand it wouldn't be something you could grasp but I wanted to get the name registered even though I didn't have the time to prepare a manifesto. It's not exactly realistic that I wouldn't put any policies on my website yet blog somewhere else without linking to it.It is unbelievable. But equally unbelievable is this Peter Saxons defence that the blog in question is nothing to do with his Sensible Party, and that founded a political party called the Sensible Party with.... no policies or manifesto whatsoever!
You are simply lying. I don't know of any Peter Saxton that is saying that. Can you justify your lies?
Some excellent windmilling tonight
I don't give a **** what you think. Obviously you are too stupid to understand any reality.
Unbelievable, I leave to go out for dinner and Pete turns his attentions to Smirnoff. Why does he start every conversation with a "put down".
This is my problem with him, the unbelievable arrogance of the man.
You set up a party called The Sensible Party ... there is a blog with policies under the title The Sensible Party. ..see above and the blog is from 2005.
Are you really so stupid that you formed and named a party after someone else's blog. If you'd have Googled your Party name that blog would have appeared and you'd have seen the **** on it.
I have not lied about anything...I made a simple and quite logical assumption.
If you told people house had a political party and then showed them a blog with the EXACT SAME name they would make the same assumption as it is logical
I didn't form or name a party after somebody else's blog. I liked the name and I registered the party.You set up a party called The Sensible Party ... there is a blog with policies under the title The Sensible Party. ..see above and the blog is from 2005.
Are you really so stupid that you formed and named a party after someone else's blog. If you'd have Googled your Party name that blog would have appeared and you'd have seen the **** on it.
I have not lied about anything...I made a simple and quite logical assumption.
If you told people house had a political party and then showed them a blog with the EXACT SAME name they would make the same assumption as it is logical
You know that is not true. But then again you love to lie about your "internet wealth" so we all know what you think of truth.The thing that tickles me is that the blog and the Peter Saxon on here seem to have quite similar ideologies....
I didn't form or name a party after somebody else's blog. I liked the name and I registered the party.
You have lied:
“Sorry...I have obviously mistaken you for this Peter Saxton of The Sensible Party who has this blog of his party's policies.”
“By the way ... did you know the nutter version of Peter Saxton not only wants prisoners to run around on giant hamster wheels but wants ALL 12 yr old children to be COMPULSORY made to use contraception...hard to believe some one could be that stupid really.”
There is no Peter Saxton saying any of these things that you accuse me of yet you are simply lying about it.
So if you started a blog saying it is from the "Labour Party" you couldn't?
I have contacted Google and they came up with a computer generated response so next I will contact Eileen Naughton personally.