The environmental issues should transcend the political divide however...
We have the Greens who put the environment absolutely first with little consideration for the reality of the prevailing social structure (not that that's an entirely bad thing) and the apparent imposition of some sort of communist ideals if I read them right.
The LP wax lyrical on the environment but are they really that committed? HS2 springs to mind for starters. They are about social change while paying a bit of lip-service to the environment.
LD's? Who knows anymore? I don't such has their lurch to the right compromised the more laudable ideals of the party.
The CP? Money. Money. And, erm, in case you haven't guessed....money. Their money and their cronies money. Such is their denial of human-driven climate change in the face of the overwhelming evidence to the contrary that they cannot be trusted on any issue be it: emissions; C footprint; pollution prevention generally; food standards; social welfare.
Whether I agree with "extinction rebellion" methods or Greta Thunberg's angry little girl style is not of consequence: that they feel forced to adopt such tactics because successive right wing, self serving, money driven, governments did not listen to them when they were being polite in saying "please listen to the scientists" is the point. Regardless of the methods they use on the issue they are quite correct about the issue itself, make no mistake. Furthermore they are pretty angry with those who would seek to excessively profit from the situation... and in that regard I am too... it is immoral that some seek to hold a ransom on providing clean air, water, land and a thriving ecosystem.