The first section is basically, "let's try to ruin it for everyone else" which, in light of all the **** aimed at "people who haven't helped Rangers enough from the likes of McCoist and Jardine" is the funniest thing he's ever written.
I know it's Friday morning and the weekend is nearly upon us but my brain melted trying to understand that sentence.
Folk have been saying how Leggo's been getting it tight on FF now. I looked on RM and saw this unusually on the money assertion http://forum.rangersmedia.co.uk/index.php?showtopic=220647 It's always been drivel but now some Bears are uncomfortable with the drivel. I don't know about anyone else, but the reason I became aware of this blog was because folk kept posting links to it on Facebook at the time of Dougie-DougieGate.
Sunday, 20 May 2012 GREEN, FANS' MONEY AND THE MAN WITH TWO NAMES SO now we know! Now Charles Green has let the cat out of the bag and revealed who it is he really wants to fund a Rangers takeover. Charlie Boy and the Green Gang want Rangers supporters to dig deep and hand over their money. The Green Gang want to fund their plans for Rangers with other people’s money. The People's money! !! Maybe the glib Green thinks the Ibrox legions are made up of folk whose heads button up the back. Maybe he believes Scots will give their money to someone they hadn’t heard of until ten days ago. Maybe Charles Green thinks Rangers supporters will hand over their hard earned to a man with TWO NAMES. Plus whose investors, who include the former Sheffield United chairman Michael McDonald, along with the probability of the controversial Paul Stretford also getting his hands on the Rangers’ cheque book. Plus Kenny Dalglish. It was interesting that in Saturday’s Daily Mail, when Michael McDonald was interviewed he did not deny that Dalglish would have a role to play. And what of the two men named by Green in what looked like a desperate attempt to ward off those who are suspicious of his claims to have TWENTY big time players in the Green Gang? One is Jude Allen, - AKA JAVAD ABDULLAH - who Green described as an Indonesian businessman. That’s pretty vague, but we now know he made his fortune as chief executive of a company called Singforce GDN BHD which managed top of the range hotels in the Middle East and Far East and he now runs a company called Lumira, a consultancy which advises on Marketing, Finance and Management. We also know the-man-with-two-names started his career in the hotel business in 1978 as the night auditor in the Kuala Lumpa Hilton. Why did Charles Green not say that? Hey, Jude, come out, come out WHOEVER you are. And then there’s Mazen Houssani. We know that he is involved with a company called Tameer Group Holdings(FZC) which described its activities as the ‘INVESTEMENT OF OUR OWN FINANCIAL RESOURCES.’ This company is based at the Sharjah Airport International Free Zone, Sharjah in the United Arab Emirates. Again, Green hedged his bets with this one and described Mazen Houssani as a lawyer. But any hack wishing to contact him, to ask Mazen Houssani questions about his involvement with Charles Green, with Michael McDonald, with Paul Stretford, with Kenny Dalglish, should email him at [email protected] (Seems like a good idea, publishing an investors details again, seeing as your club can really afford another investor pulling out after abuse) For the moment though the Green Gang’s masterplan is to go to the 26,000 so called small shareholders in the Ibrox club and ask them to buy more shares. Then the Green Gang will want even more dough from fans. Supporters who have previously never owned shares will be corralled to cough up their cash. The Green Gang want money from Rangers supporters. Bottom line! (Where else are they going to get it from? Surely you guys knew from the start any new ownership deal would have to involve this somehow ... you sold the rights to all your working capital Leggo!) I find it hard to believe that if the Green Gang have £8.5M lodged in a client account with a firm of London lawyers and if the Green Gang also have another £20M on tap, as Green says, they need supporters' money. Why is it, if there are so many people of substance and wealth involved, does Green need a few hundred here and grand there from the ranks of the working class wage earners who make up the legions who follow Rangers? And why does he think they’ll hand over their hard earned wages to Charles Green in order that people such as Michael McDonald, Paul Stretford and Kenny Dalglish can walk into the Blue Room and be handed the keys to the priceless prizes in the Trophy Room? If Charles Green and the Green Gang don’t think Rangers supporters’ heads button up the back, it must be because they think the buttons have been replaced with zips. …….. AND…… ON the subject of heads which either button or zip up the back, it is time for an update on the imprecise bumbling which marks Odious Creep as a man of little journalistic talent. His latest bungling blunder came on Twitter when he adopted his usual snooty-look-down-his-nose arrogance to having his increasingly outrageous opinions questioned. After somebody claimed that the Scottish Football Association’s sentence on Rangers had no basis in law, class conscious snob Odious Creep sneered that two Scottish Law Lords, Lord Nimmo Smith and Lord Carloway had delivered the judgment so it must be based in law. ONE…..Lord Nimmo Smith was only involved in gathering the evidence. The Judicial Panel, made up of two non legal members and chaired by Gary Allan QC, delivered the verdict and sentence. Nimmo Smith played no part in either the verdict or sentence. Lord Carloway sat as the chairman of the Appeals body which confirmed the verdict. TWO…..Odious Creep seems to believe all lawyers and all judges think alike and interpret the law the same way. THREE…. In Britain, it is usual for three judges to hear appeals and not all of their verdicts are unanimous. In the United States of America, the Supreme Court, the last resort of appeals, is made up of NINE judges. FOUR….Put any ten lawyers in a room, ask a question and sit back and await anything up to ten differing offers of legal advice. Is it any wonder that the two organisations which employ Odious Creep the most, the Sunday Herald and Radio Clyde, are in such a mess? And that it’s the men who employ Odious Creep who he many believe have heads which button or zip up the back. More of which later. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nice wee bit about Spiers at the end there, nice too see he hasn't forgot about his main storyline.
What's with the constant date of birth ****e? Am I missing something? Feels too hard to try decipher the rantings of the demented at this time on a Monday morning.
Why? What the **** relevance does his date of birth have to do with anything? Is there some sectarian angle I'm missing here?
Think about it FFS. 23rd of May means the **** is a Gemini!! The sign of the taig! Born in 1953 meaning he was born in the Chinese year of the Snake!! And I'm sure there could could be a 9/11 reference if you add up the consortium's date of birth and divide by Craig Whyte's phone number.
