Most of the media are reacting with indignation at the difference on the fines between SEVCO and hearts and the difference in the apparent length of the alleged registration embargo, which seems totally ineffective at rfc who have signed more players than any club in Christendom and playing them as trialists yet they are fully contracted to the club. Effin joke. Media are deliberately ignoring, perhaps because some Tom Jack or Harry is pulling the strings as has been the case for a long time and exposed by CF, the obvious and glaring differences in the two administrations. Hearts through no fault of their own fell into financial difficulties because the foreign bank they owed money to collapsed. Hearts initially paid and are trying to pay the social taxes they owe. Rfc on the other hand went under owing well over Â£100m and potentially approaching Â£200m pounds, most of which was owed as a result of avoiding and possibly evading taxes over a decade. They also deliberately evaded tax throughout their last season in a vain attempt to earn more money for themselves, yet at the same time trying to negotiate a lesser payment to HMRC. The extent of the debts, the damage was more widespread with rfc and there was tax evasion proved by LNS and possibly on a great scale if HMRC eventually win their case. The two situations are totally different and the media know it, the certainly know it, they know it, the SFA know it and sure as hell HMRC know it.