The Daily Arsenal

Yes, I was saying that the implication from Bierhoff is that Wenger should set up the Arsenal team around Ozil, not that Wenger does do it.

You way you want to enter into proper footy discussions with me, Pix, but then you misrepresent what I write. How can anyone expect to hold a serious discussion with anyone who does that?

 

And that's why I said the implication was wrong. You've even agreed with me on that.

 

You're arguing about agreeing with each other. Class.

 

Are you surprised?....

 

No, just pointing out of to them, it's funny.

 

Nothing those two got up to, apart from actually agreeing about anything at all, would surprise me.

 

HIAG's finding it challenging to admit that he agrees with me. All part of his long road to recovery from a life of ****wittery.

 

There is no argument on my part, Luvvy.

Pixie is being wilfully obtuse, but I don't mind that. I no longer take such a tactic to heart, because I have seen him use this tactic in every argument in which he finds himself out of his depth. He uses the tactic all the time with PNP, for example. The old HIAG gave up trying to hold a sensible conversation with Pixie and took to out-and-out wummery as an act of defiance; but the new HIAG is made of sterner stuff. I am determined to have a sensible conversation with Pixie, even if it takes several years for him to attain the ability to do that.

The new HIAG is not interested in wumming.

 

Old Gimp/new gimp

 

You are agreeing with me you cockshine Stop trying to act like the victim

 

Ah, see, that's a real shame that you had to resort to this kind of abuse.

I had hoped that we could leave all of that behind us.

 

The old HIAG would have been all over that like a nasty rash, but not the new HIAG.

 

Do you entertain absolutely no possibility that they are not the same person? If you are wrong (and I guess we'll never know for sure) your posts are utterly pointless.

 

I posted that nearly a month ago, why go back to that now there's an entente cordiale?

Some might think you were **** stirring, not me obviously.

 

I've only just read it. Just curious about your complete certainty. Ignore it if you want. Not trying to bring anything back up, but was interested.

 

It's been done to death mate, I don't want to go over old ground again. If you want to know why I reached that conclusion use the search function

 

Fair enough. To be honest, didn't notice the date. You are right, let sleeping dogs lie. Apologies.

 

Probably for the best mate

 

Probably best that you don't act like a cockshine then