The Cricket Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
All that work to see off O'Neill. And then you just gift your wicket to their weakest bowler, when the lead is still only 58.
 
That's a shocker for Surrey.

Looks like us and Leicester will be cut adrift from the rest, going into the break.
 
Jake is now the 4th highest runscorer in D1. He's also comfortably the highest runscorer without a century to his name - but hopefully that won't be the case much longer.

We also have the batter with the second highest number of runs with no centuries, which is Gubbins (who is about 20th in the full list).
 
Based on that 14 man squad, I'm assuming that either Neal or Lumsden will be playing tomorrow. I'm not sure why Wheal isn't named? Given that we're already without Baker, Turner, and Jack, it'll be a shame if Wheal is injured.