Hopefully we'll pick one of those up.Into the wildcard draft they both go. Big wow.
Hopefully we'll pick one of those up.Into the wildcard draft they both go. Big wow.
Hopefully we'll pick one of those up.
Into the wildcard draft they both go. Big wow.
That's one out of two then...For the first time, I think Hants T20 line up would trounce the Brave's line up.
I've been calling for Prest for a long time now in the CC.A grand total of 14 runs scored today between Organ, Holland and Weatherley.
Whichever two we decide to open with next week, I'm not sure it'll be much different to previous seasons. I just hope that we revert back to just the two of them, rather than all three.
If we need someone to cover for Dawson next week (if he doesn't recover from injury in time), I'd rather it was Prest. (And that's nothing to do with the fact that he got the second highest score for us today.)
The main limitation in the IPL is that unless you don't select the maximum of 4 overseas players in your line up, the sub has to be an Indian player.I've got no interest in the IPL itself, but I am interested to see how well the new substitution rule (or "impact player") goes down. It's something I could see being adopted in other competitions in the future if it works well.
As far as I can tell, there are only very limited exceptions on when it can't be used. You can pretty much make the substitution at any stage of that match, and regardless of whether the player being substituted has already contributed to the match (eg you can sub-out a bowler who has used his four-over allocation, and bring in a new bowler with a fresh new four-over allocation).
It basically turns it into a 12-a-side match, but with only 11 allowed to bat each innings, and only 11 allowed to field at any one time.
The main limitation in the IPL is that unless you don't select the maximum of 4 overseas players in your line up, the sub has to be an Indian player.