The Cricket Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
There was barely a dot ball before Weatherly got out. But these two are now chewing up a fair few of them.
 
I don't know how much we're short by (if at all). But we absolutely left 20 runs out there, given how we limped through those last few overs. Time will tell if it costs us.
 
Wickets in the PP are more important than economy. I'd rather we have them 70-3 than 50-1.
 
Shocking call to give that a wide

No idea why wides can't be reviewed with DRS. Such an easy tweak to the rules.
 
Saints_Alive said:
Mallander needs to go to specsavers. There was no 6 without those wides.
Click to expand...

Eight runs in total. Which wouldn't have happened if the third umpire was allowed two seconds to get involved.

Thankfully we've got him out. But those eight run still stand, and they could be huge.
 
Interesting to give Wheal a third in the PP. I can't think we've done that this season.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back