The Cricket Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
If we're only going to give Dawson seven balls, his place in the team has to immediately come into question.

Through absolutely no fault of his own, he's only batted in the middle for two balls (vs Essex a week ago) in about the last month prior to today. Hence he'll be totally under-cooked with the bat, and so I wouldn't be expecting particularly good scores from him. Therefore, it needs to be his bowling which keeps him in the team. And bowling seven balls isn't that.
 
Vince, QDK, Davies, Conway, CDG, Whiteley, Garton, Jordan, Archer, Briggs, Mills still looks very tasty to me. With Dawson and Overton as a couple of excellent reserves.

We could look at Waller or Lintott rather than Briggs, if we wouldn't something less conventional. But at least for now, I favour sticking with Briggs' experience.

Being thrashed is never nice, but at least it was to Rockets. Of the other seven, they and Oval easily look the best sides to me. And that's hardly a surprise. When at full strength, Notts and Surrey are probably the two strongest t20 sides. Trent are Notts with added oomph. Oval are Surrey with added oomph.
 
A massive 173-4 for the Welsh Fire, none of whom are actually Welsh, but that’s the biggest score of the Hundred so far by a long way.
 
Plunkett having a shocker. But to be fair to the guy, he's barely bowled for two years.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back