The Cricket Thread

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Should really give MOTM to all the five bowlers (for different reasons). Tough to make a call between them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ChilcoSaint
Do what Chilco recommended to me - IPTV through Saintsplayer. I can’t say how wonderful it is to finally get footie, cricket and rugby all for £70 a year .... :emoticon-0103-cool:

A bit in the paper, this morning, about how so many people are using illegal streams, so cue Sky and BT going all out to disrupt it.
 
A bit in the paper, this morning, about how so many people are using illegal streams, so cue Sky and BT going all out to disrupt it.
They won’t be able to stop people streaming from other countries’ broadcasters though. IPTV now contains its own VPN, so it’s no problem at all to use NBC or Bein or whatever instead of Sky. For football, anyway. I’d be really annoyed if they stop me watching cricket!
 
A bit in the paper, this morning, about how so many people are using illegal streams, so cue Sky and BT going all out to disrupt it.

But is IPTV illegal? I seem to recall, a while ago, a case where it was deemed legal if you're watching it and not charging anyone to share? Mind you - i'm now seriously looking at changing my IP as my service from Sky in terms of broadband has seriously dropped off in the last few months and, of course, you can't actually speak to anyone in their support - so you log a call and they tell you it will be fixed within 48 hours but no change ......
 
  • Like
Reactions: San Tejón
Understandable as it is basically theft. Few matches were filmed in the past, so, if the big companies don’t put money in because they get money back, we’ll return to poor coverage by amateur cameramen. Not likely to happen, but Sky, BT etc aren’t charities.

Does that make you receivers of stolen goods :)
 
Understandable as it is basically theft. Few matches were filmed in the past, so, if the big companies don’t put money in because they get money back, we’ll return to poor coverage by amateur cameramen. Not likely to happen, but Sky, BT etc aren’t charities.

Does that make you receivers of stolen goods :)

Don't know about that, but the performances by West Brom and West Ham should be reported to the trades description act as they certainly weren't "football" :emoticon-0102-bigsm
 
Vince at his very, very, very best might have been able to compete with that Crawley innings. But no-one else. Weakened team or not, that was far too good.

I didn't even think we bowled that badly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Saints_Alive