2 go up.
Thought it was 9 and 9. My bad.3 this year. 1 down, 3 up, 10 team D1 as from next season.
Which is good, giving up and coming England candidates 18 4-day games instead of only 14 this season.3 this year. 1 down, 3 up, 10 team D1 as from next season.
Nope. Still only 14 matches.Which is good, giving up and coming England candidates 18 4-day games instead of only 14 this season.
Oh for ****’s sake, that makes no sense whatsoever!Nope. Still only 14 matches.
To be fair, it would be difficult to fit 18 matches into the season.Oh for ****’s sake, that makes no sense whatsoever!
Drop that ridiculous 100.To be fair, it would be difficult to fit 18 matches into the season.
Still in two minds about that. It will bring the biggest names in cricket to England but not sure about the format.Drop that ridiculous 100.
Oh for ****’s sake, that makes no sense whatsoever!
Lets hope we avoid going to Somerset and Essex next season.Still the same as this season (and the last two seasons).
All that is happening is that the 8-10 split is being reversed to 10-8. But all 18 sides still have 7 home and 7 away matches.
Counties complained that the 8-10 split meant that relegation from D1 had become too big a risk (which it had - the last two years have been a case of musical chairs for 7th place). By reducing that risk, counties/captains can take bigger risks now on the field; sacrifice the odd draw, in an attempt to win. Which should lead to more exciting cricket. When survival is on the line, you can't really do that.
And ditching the 100 wouldn't really be an answer to playing 18 D1 matches, because the 100 isn't using up its own section of the county schedule. It's being played at the same time as the one-day cup.
I don’t think anyone wants to go to Fortress Chelmsford!Lets hope we avoid going to Somerset and Essex next season.![]()
Abbott tearing through Somerset.