1992 apparently.Must be a long time since we had three century makers in one innings.
1992 apparently.Must be a long time since we had three century makers in one innings.
One point in the bag so far for Lancs. Four points in the bag so far for Durham. Big day for both tomorrow - chance for Durham to take full control of their match, and quite the opposite for Lancs.
Sounds like Durham might well leave out Stoneman and Borthwick against us next week (due to them both leaving for Surrey), if they win this week to secure their survival. And, quite obviously, such a result would leave them with a whole lot less to play for next week than us. So it's far from clear cut that a Durham defeat here is the best outcome for us. Absolutely though the best outcome is for a Lancs defeat. The last thing we want is for (a) us to be unable to catch them, and (b) them to have nothing to play for next week, and potentially roll over for Warks.
Yeah, Notts as they are down.So Surrey are the Manchester City/United of cricket. Hoovering up the talent. Pity they are not going down again. These bonus points could be absolutely precious at both ends of the table. Is there a team with nothing to play for in Division 1?
So Surrey are the Manchester City/United of cricket. Hoovering up the talent. Pity they are not going down again. These bonus points could be absolutely precious at both ends of the table. Is there a team with nothing to play for in Division 1?
Steve Davies available. Come on Hants snap him up.
As for incoming new eight team t20 league, I think my position on it is a very biased one. If one of those sides is based at the Rose Bowl, I'll be in support of it (at least to start with). If no side is though, I'll be against it. Ultimately, as a supporter, the ability to go and watch matches is probably my number 1 concern. Regardless of how biased or selfish that is.
Unfortunately, I do very much fear that of the nine test grounds, we would be the one to miss out. I think our only saving grace could be that ticket sales for t20 up in Durham are generally very poor. So maybe it might be they who miss out.
That said, we did vote in favour of it (and Rod has been openly in favour of it for some time now). So maybe they have reassurances behind the scenes? (Only Surrey, Sussex and Kent voted against it).
PS. If this is the start of the path to three divisions of six in the Championship, then great. For me, the CC is crying out to be three divisions of six rather than two divisions of nine.
Eight in Division 1, ten in division 2.