1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

The Chris Wood Is Immense & Totally Brilliant Thread

Discussion in 'Leicester City' started by Danger Fox, Jan 5, 2013.

  1. roseniorhisgranisfromhull

    roseniorhisgranisfromhull Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2011
    Messages:
    3,329
    Likes Received:
    558
    Is it? Who's the best side he's scored against? Barnsley, Brighton, Blackburn, Leeds, Forest, Huddersfield, Birmingham and Burton are the only sides he's scored against this season. I don't see a top side like a Hull or a Cardiff on that list.
     
    #21
  2. Jack Lesterfan

    Jack Lesterfan Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2012
    Messages:
    4,337
    Likes Received:
    361
    Meh, if he scores against everyone else in the league then I'd be happy.

    Rather that than spend £2.6m on a striker to only score against Ipswich and Leyton Orient <ok>
     
    #22
  3. Lesta Gangsta

    Lesta Gangsta Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,764
    Likes Received:
    142
    He was playing for Millwall for God's sake. It takes more than one player to score a goal. We've outplayed most sides this season, we just haven't had that finishing touch. We have now.

    I don't think Hull fans should be lecturing us on expensive strikers that can only score passed ****e sides! <laugh>
     
    #23
  4. roseniorhisgranisfromhull

    roseniorhisgranisfromhull Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2011
    Messages:
    3,329
    Likes Received:
    558
    Doesn't bother me, wasn't my money. <ok>

    I made my point, you knew I was right, you had to bring back the Proschwitz argument which is totally irrelevant.
     
    #24
  5. Lesta Gangsta

    Lesta Gangsta Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,764
    Likes Received:
    142
    I addressed you "point" in the firs paragraph. How do you expect him to score for Millwall against sides that have the ability to play Millwall off the park? Few, if any, teams in this division can play better than us.

    It doesn't bother you? Has it not occurred to you that Hull could have run away with this division if that £2.6m had been spent wisely? You are now in a very vulnerable 2nd spot and have the most expensive sub outside the top flight. Well done. <ok>
     
    #25
  6. AKCJ

    AKCJ Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    21,874
    Likes Received:
    2,934
    Actually he can't have scored against Hull because he didn't play against you and he only played 30 minutes against Cardiff when he made his debut.

    It's a ridiculous argument anyway. He's only played for us against Huddersfield and Burton and he's been superb in both games. He's scored 3 goals.

    Is a good striker one that scores 20 goals a season but none against the 'top sides' better than one that scores 6 a season one against each of the top 6?

    Anyway, like Gangsta said, Hullare hardly the team to be lecturing us on strikers.
     
    #26

  7. roseniorhisgranisfromhull

    roseniorhisgranisfromhull Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2011
    Messages:
    3,329
    Likes Received:
    558

    No, it doesn't bother me one bit. We're playing great football and that's all that bothers me. If we've got an expensive sub, I couldn't care less. If we go up, great. If we don't, doesn't bother me.

    Millwall are 7th, 4 points behind you and they beat you. So the argument that he couldn't score against any good teams because the players around him weren't good enough is a fairly poor one.

    AKCJ summed it up nicely, he's only played twice for you, against 2 sides enormously lacking in any real ability. The side bottom of the form table and a side that's mid-table in League Two.

    As for having the most expensive sub outside the Premier League, again, you're just quite blatantly wrong. Off the top of my head, the likes of Jamie O'Hara, Zigic, Goodwillie, Sordell, N'Gog, etc are all regularly substitutes and all cost more than Proschwitz.
     
    #27
  8. AKCJ

    AKCJ Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    21,874
    Likes Received:
    2,934
    None of which cost more than 2.6m and if they did they were in the PL at the time or would still demand that transfer fee.
     
    #28
  9. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,941
    Likes Received:
    76,791
    If Proschwitz had cost nothing and Aluko had cost £2.6m, then nobody would bat an eye, despite the outcome being exactly the same.

    The fact is, we didn't spend £2.6m on Proschwitz, but even if we had, it's all we spent and we brought in Aluko, Quinn, Faye, Bruce, Proschwitz and Jakupovic, that is exceptional value for money.
     
    #29
  10. AKCJ

    AKCJ Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    21,874
    Likes Received:
    2,934
    So the same with us last season then? <laugh>

    What do they say about shoes and the other foot?
     
    #30
  11. roseniorhisgranisfromhull

    roseniorhisgranisfromhull Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2011
    Messages:
    3,329
    Likes Received:
    558
    Zigic - £6 million.

    O'Hara - £3.5 million.

    Goodwillie - £2.8 million.

    Sordell & N'Gog were undisclosed but both believed to be over the fee of Proschwitz.

    When you say none of those were more than £2.6 million, are you going to argue that £6 million is less than £2.6 million?

    What difference does it make if they were in the Prem or not?

    You are now in a very vulnerable 2nd spot and have the most expensive sub outside the top flight. Was the quote. Not, "you have the most expensive sub who wasn't signed whilst you were in the Premier League that's currently playing in the Championship."

    For the record, are we supposed to be disappointed that we're in a vulnerable 2nd spot? <laugh>

    Like I say, it doesn't bother me if Proschwitz cost £2 million or £20 million, as luckily, it's not coming out my pocket. I just feel I have to pick up on these comments you folk make that are blatant lies.
     
    #31
  12. AKCJ

    AKCJ Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    21,874
    Likes Received:
    2,934
    Was Zigic not signed in the Premier League then? <doh>

    When the club could afford the fee without spending out of their means.

    He's not a sub, either.

    As for the rest, they're all young players and have been signed in the PL apart from O'Hara who has been blighted by injuries and would still be playing for Spurs had he not.
     
    #32
  13. roseniorhisgranisfromhull

    roseniorhisgranisfromhull Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2011
    Messages:
    3,329
    Likes Received:
    558
    Did I not just point out that in Gangsta's original quote he made no reference to Prozzy being the most expensive sub outside the Premier League that wasn't signed in the Premier League. I know I did, but just in case you missed it, I've made it again there. Hope that helps.

    Obviously we could afford the fee or else we wouldn't have done the deal, we also wouldn't have spent £1.5 mil on Meyler or what's believed to be around £2 mil for Brady this January, and that's before we've made our biggest move of the window, for a striker.

    You make these points but they have no relevance. What does it matter if O'Hara's had injury problems. He's still a sub, he still cost more than Prozzy, therefore, Gangsta was wrong. It'd be a lot easier if you Leicester lot accepted you'd made a mistake instead of creating a long-winded argument about it.
     
    #33
  14. Lesta Gangsta

    Lesta Gangsta Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,764
    Likes Received:
    142
    It's pretty obvious I meant the Prozzie is the most expensive sub signed outside of the Prem. As AKCJ pointed out, paying that sum in the Prem is commonplace, but you're not in the Prem. Do you get a sick thrill from being pedantic?

    No Championship club can afford to spend £2.6m on a player that doesn't play and if you're happy being 2nd with three teams following right up your ass than running away with the league then fair play, but somehow I doubt it.
     
    #34
  15. roseniorhisgranisfromhull

    roseniorhisgranisfromhull Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 9, 2011
    Messages:
    3,329
    Likes Received:
    558
    I'm afraid it wasn't obvious. In future, if you want to make things obvious, say what you mean.

    What do you mean by that though, we can't afford to do it? You see because, we may have done just that, but it's not like we're in financial trouble because of it.

    <laugh> Really? You think I'm not happy that City are 2nd and playing probably the best football in my time of watching us? Like I say, it doesn't bother me that there are clubs close to us, it wouldn't even both me if those clubs went above us. I watch football for entertainment, that's all really. Things like promotions are just a bonus.
     
    #35
  16. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,941
    Likes Received:
    76,791
    It could be worse, we could have paid that much for a striker, then sent him out on loan while still paying half his wages. <laugh>
     
    #36
  17. Lesta Gangsta

    Lesta Gangsta Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    6,764
    Likes Received:
    142
    Yeah, got forbid any club does that. Where's Jimmy Bullard these days anyway. <laugh>
     
    #37
  18. AKCJ

    AKCJ Well-Known Member Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    21,874
    Likes Received:
    2,934
    We paid 2.6m? We're paying half his wages?

    Do you work for Leicester City?
     
    #38
  19. originallambrettaman

    originallambrettaman Mod Moderator Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2011
    Messages:
    111,941
    Likes Received:
    76,791
    He got sacked for being a **** and wasn't a striker.

    Where's Jermaine Beckford these days?
     
    #39
  20. I used to be john fallen

    I used to be john fallen Active Member

    Joined:
    Jun 9, 2011
    Messages:
    3,448
    Likes Received:
    19
    I don't care what anybody else thinks, prossie will prove to be a snip, mark my words<ok> I can hear the faint rumblings of a goal avalanche heading towards the championship...I suggest we all "dig in" and pray we survive the blitzkrieg to come..<ok> now he's had a "sniff" of blood I can see double figures by the end of the season... so watch out...<ok>
     
    #40

Share This Page