These have to be some of the weakest arguments i've ever seen for a player not moving!! They have no manager Technically true (will be Hiddink with a couple of weeks) but most players sign for the club not the manager who could be sacked within a few months anyway (man u and arsenal aside). And given Hiddink is already on the pay roll, like he hasn't had an input on the bid. Funds What has this got to do with Modric and his decision to move or not. Comfort Zone If this is a genuine reason you can keep him, we want winners with ambition. Chelsea's dressing room atmosphere is actually one of the reasons behind our success and it is well known how close the Chelsea boys are. Guaranteed Trophies No club (except maybe Barca) can guarantee trophies but we offer a bigger chance than he currently has. Just ask a bookmaker. Insulting Offer This is laughable. Like Modric really gives a **** what offers are made or agreed. Thats not his problem.
Do you not think his agent might care given the fact that he'll get a fat cut of it? Of course he'll push for the highest offer possible
You dont own the board of the 2nd biggest team in north London and whether you want my opinion or not, I couldn't give a ****. Enjoy your battle for 5th.
but the issue was reasons for Modric leaving not reasons for his agent. Anyway, his agent wouldn't jeopodise a move, better to get a cut of something than nothing.
Right, a bit of banter is one thing but I refuse to tolerate name-calling like that on this board! You have been warned, 100!
Oh - if he goes anywhere it will be to City, at least they have a manager, have won trophies more recently and can afford him.[/QUOTE] They have only one a trophy recently, not trophies - see we can all be predantic!! sorry couldnt resist!!!
They have only one a trophy recently, not trophies - see we can all be predantic!! sorry couldnt resist!!![/QUOTE] Should have resisted - it was phrased correctly! They have won more trohies, one more.
For a fan of a club that has an ageing team without replacements, whose strikers can't score or don't want to be back-up to someone who can't score, with a squad riddled with self-interest, a financier with as much loyalty as their club captain and season tickets on general sale for next season, you're counting poultry that the same won't apply to your lot...
I have to agree with you Ensil,if he goes with whom do we replace him is the most important aspect. I hope he stays because if he leaves it will mean that money is the most important thing to all concerned.
I was correct on both counts; you are argumentative for the sake of being so and you don't understand English. One assumes that the spelling mistakes were deliberate - if not, are you sure that you're a chav and not a goon as you seem to be fluent in goonish.[/QUOTE] You said, 'have won trophies more recently'. If you had said they won 'a trophy' more recently then fine. Trophies suggests more than one. Are you sure you're not a spurs fan cos you're shockingly deluded....oh wait you are.
Yet with all these 'problems' we still finished 2nd in the league, how good will we be if we even sort out half these alleged 'problems'.
If my auntie had balls she'd be my uncle! What if's blah blah blah, IF we hadn't thrown away all them points to lesser opposition we'd have won the title
100 years,what should concern you is the sacking of your successful manager. That imo was a stupid move. So if Hiddinck doesn't start well is he going to be fired as well and then who? It's not last season now it's this and second wasn't good enough? I'd be careful if were you.
The real question is how bad would you be if they don't get sorted out? You dropped out of the top four in February, and it was our winless streak that opened the door for you to get back in there.
It was our form in Nov-Jan that even gave you a sniff at the top four. Our worst period of form in 15 years and you still got nowhere near us in the end and with Liverpool improving...oh dear oh dear.
