Seriously, how is Klopp and Rodgers even a debate? I can understand Rodgers having some good will left from last year seeing that he overachieved for you guys and had you playing excellent football, but there is only one reason to have Rodgers over Klopp and that is because he is the current Liverpool Manager and you guy's don't just sack managers like that (except for Hodge Podge).
Otherwise Klopp wins hands down
Football Style
Klopp - more attacking, more goals, fast paced pressing style
Rodgers
- doesn't have a set philosophy, only scored loads of goals in 1 season at pool, has had goals in only 1 of his seasons at liverpool and seemingly changes philosophies every half a season).
Transfers/Youth -
Klopp bought in (rather than inherited) Gundogan, Kagawa, Lewandoski, Reus, Gotze, Bender, Grosskeutz, Hummels, Pizcek, Aubemayang,
Blaszczykowski and at relatively cheap prices. Apart from this year where he has spent 50m, he literally has a 0 Net spend. So that's 50m over 7 years.
Rodgers - His hits are Coutinho, Sturridge and Sahko. He has bought through Sterling (and even then fans are unhappy with sterling),
Flanno and Ibe. He has spent 100m over 3 years and literally
Trophies
Klopp I don't even need to go into this. He took Dortmund to a champions league final and in an impressive stylish way and were unlucky to lose to Bayern.
Talk ****
Admittedly i don't follow german football much so can't comment on how much **** Klopp chats
Rodgers - King of the chatting **** including my all time favourite gaff of Spurs spending 100m should be challenging for a title (even though they finished 5th) when his own team is finishes 2nd and spends 120m.
Longevity
Klopp - done it over a longer period and been successful for 4 seasons running
Rodgers - Had 1 successful season.