Fook off Mighty we know how it works as we're still paying Robbie Fowler's weekly shopping bill. Billy we supposedly got £8m for Delph (Even though we were offered £10m by Newcastle). Can you remember if we got some sell on cash when he went to City?
But there is some good news for Fulham, and bad news for Leeds United, as the Cottagers will be keeping all of that money – according to Radio Yorkshire. Leeds did not include a sell-on clause in their deal when they sold McCormack for £11 million to Fulham in 2014. like i said Doc a big fat zero
Hey Mighty Mouse, tell us all about Millfalls preparations for the new season, or have they bulldozed the den yet ?
Fooking uselesss twots But there is some good news for Fulham, and bad news for Leeds United, as the Cottagers will be keeping all of that money – according to Radio Yorkshire. Leeds did not include a sell-on clause in their deal when they sold McCormack for £11 million to Fulham in 2014. Leeds had to pay Cardiff City a percentage of their transfer fee received as a sell-on clause two years ago, but Leeds will apparently not benefit in a similar way.
If i remember rightly Ross's fee was made up of Addons eg; apperances,goals,if Fulham won promotion, etc,etc,etc, they dont count now so infact i think you have lost money
You shouldn't be thinking. You might hurt yourself. Sit down, shut up and pull the travel rug around you.
We have all learned a couple of very valuable lessons from your posts. 1. Dementia is a tragic illness. 2. Never eat cheap beef #bseinfectedlivestock We do admire how you still carry on though.
Mighty,don't forget to put a Clause on Gregory's sale,like £1 for every fuse he changes and maybe £100 for re wireing a house.
In the crazy world of football, if Martinez can take over the Belgium National side, then Holloway could take over Brazil
Leeds had a sell-on clause with Delph, but only if the transfer fee was above his release clause of £8m ... Citeh, of course, only needed to match the £8m minimum fee to activate Delph's release, so Leeds got nothing ... that genius Bates really wasn't concentrating when agreeing to a sell-on above £8m as Villa simply wrote a minimum release of that exact figure into Delph's contract which meant they would retain the transfer fee Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk