And thats what doesn't stack up... If he's so bang to rights and there's so much evidence, why hasn't he been charged yet? It may well turn out thats he's a fraudulent git, but as it stands 5 months in, he's still not been charged. Why would that be?
Probably the scale of the fraud - hundreds of invoices, multiple bank accounts (at least 12 in 4 different countries), claims and counter claims, offshore accounts, 3rd parties - they have only just received confirmation from HSBC that the majority of the fake invoices were paid into accounts set up by Haigh or linked to him - paid into 1 account, transferred to another, then another - all overseas and governed by different laws - will probably take them a year to follow the money trail alone! Will be very suprised if he acted alone on this as a hell of a lot of work and planning must have gone into it!! Imagine keeping track of £5M in 12 or more different bank accounts spread acroos the globe?
as long as the accounts are in the name of a canine, then he should be found not guilty after a celebrity trial.........or should that be in the name of a camel ???
