1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

The breakfast debate

Discussion in 'Leeds United' started by ellandback, Jan 17, 2014.

  1. FORZA LEEDS

    FORZA LEEDS Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jun 4, 2011
    Messages:
    13,622
    Likes Received:
    21,926
    I'm not bothered about Barnes either but the point is the man that matters, McDermott, wanted him, and wasn't supported.
    Or it could all be bollocks and McDermott wasn't interested at all. Maybe Hay's just bullshitting.
     
    #21
  2. The-Don

    The-Don Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    9,656
    Likes Received:
    927
    thats what I mean they haven't supported the manager (although I get the impression the new consortium wanting to back him its just GFHs daddy who didn't want to)
     
    #22
  3. ristac

    ristac Well-Known Member
    Forum Moderator

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2011
    Messages:
    27,771
    Likes Received:
    31,956
    More worrying that the Gaffer wanted to waste that amount on him??
     
    #23
  4. The-Don

    The-Don Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2011
    Messages:
    9,656
    Likes Received:
    927
    Other people think he's **** but I think he would be a good foil for Ross,

    Noel and Smith where a risk thats backfired imo but they where cheap we need someone to step up the the plate and claim that spot alongside Ross and I think Barnes would have done that
     
    #24
  5. Chippy / Glory

    Chippy / Glory Senior Member

    Joined:
    Jul 3, 2012
    Messages:
    47,417
    Likes Received:
    12,662
    352 will also work with 3 centre backs as long as the wide men in the 5 tackle back. This would stop us getting over run in midfield. 442 or 4321 are the way to go though.
     
    #25

Share This Page