The BIG thread of hun topics and other assorted mentalness from Albatross!

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Biggus Diccus said:
It's actually a really diverse country - like a lot of South American countries.

Brazil and Peru have large ethnically Japanese communities.

The Falklanders, though, ARE the direct descendants of settlers from one nation, mostly as witnessed by all ugly they all are.

I think Mick comparing the diverse Argentine populace with about 6 families of web-toed weirdos was uncharacteristically misgiven.
Click to expand...

Almost all the American Countries have a diverse populous.

Going by "Bib's law", the Falkland islanders have an almost exclusively British ancestory and thus should remain British, at least until every last bit of oil is squeezed out of the surrounding sea-bed.

Rule Britannia!!
 
Biggus Diccus said:
It's actually a really diverse country - like a lot of South American countries.

Brazil and Peru have large ethnically Japanese communities.

The Falklanders, though, ARE the direct descendants of settlers from one nation, mostly as witnessed by all ugly they all are.

I think Mick comparing the diverse Argentine populace with about 6 families of web-toed weirdos was uncharacteristically misgiven.
Click to expand...


To be fair it was a bit of a smash and grab comment. I know an Argentine lady who's dad is Chinese and her mum is native American (she's about a 6 pinter) so I knew I was over-simplifying things by emphasising the Spanish origins of the country, but sometimes you really can't be annoyed putting the effort into being exact.
 
Rangers caught lying about there world record attendance. Title to be stripped.

CROWDS at Celtic and Rangers games this season have been up to 20,000 lower than the figures released to the public.

It goes some way to explaining the huge gaps in the stands when the clubs have been claiming near full-houses.

The number of supporters the clubs publicise as turning up to home SPL and Division Three matches is far larger than the true figure reported to police, official records show.

Fans used freedom of information laws to force Strathclyde Police to reveal the real number of supporters attending games at Ibrox and Parkhead.

We obtained the figures as they are now on public record.

Celtic publicised a figure of 49,428 on the SPL website for their game against Ross County at Parkhead in December – 20,497 more than the real attendance of 28,931.

And when Rangers played Queen’s Park at Ibrox in October, the attendance figure published on the Scottish Footbal League website was 49,463.

But the real number given to police was just 34,481 – a difference of 14,982.

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/.../celtic--rangers-attendances-inflated-1767244
 
eric cartman said:
Rangers caught lying about there world record attendance. Title to be stripped.

CROWDS at Celtic and Rangers games this season have been up to 20,000 lower than the figures released to the public.

It goes some way to explaining the huge gaps in the stands when the clubs have been claiming near full-houses.

The number of supporters the clubs publicise as turning up to home SPL and Division Three matches is far larger than the true figure reported to police, official records show.

Fans used freedom of information laws to force Strathclyde Police to reveal the real number of supporters attending games at Ibrox and Parkhead.

We obtained the figures as they are now on public record.

Celtic publicised a figure of 49,428 on the SPL website for their game against Ross County at Parkhead in December – 20,497 more than the real attendance of 28,931.

And when Rangers played Queen’s Park at Ibrox in October, the attendance figure published on the Scottish Footbal League website was 49,463.

But the real number given to police was just 34,481 – a difference of 14,982.

http://www.dailyrecord.co.uk/sport/.../celtic--rangers-attendances-inflated-1767244
Click to expand...

Have we not known (or at least guessed) this for years? Judging by numbers of empty seats I'd say attendances at CP have been considerably lower than the published figures since Strachan's time.

It's not just in Scotland either. I noticed on Match of the Day, Arsenal had plenty of empty seats but always seem to report 60,000 attendances
 
AP: Password Mong said:
Have we not known (or at least guessed) this for years? Judging by numbers of empty seats I'd say attendances at CP have been considerably lower than the published figures since Strachan's time.

It's not just in Scotland either. I noticed on Match of the Day, Arsenal had plenty of empty seats but always seem to report 60,000 attendances
Click to expand...

Same as Man Utd, they always report full houses.
 
So the MSM campaign to catapult the new club, with associate membership up the leagues is picking up momentum.

Question for the MSM, such as fat DJ and daft Guidi. Which of the current clubs at the top of Div 2 in the SFL do they say should be demoted to make room for SEVCO ? A club currently performing as one of the top 3 will have to take the place of SEVCO in the new second Div of the SFL, yet that very club will have to walk away from their rightful place earned by outstanding performance throughout the season in div 1 so that SEVCO can be catapulted unjustly and unmerited up the leagues, not for the sake of Scottish football, because it makes no diffrence to attendances between other clubs, but to allow SEVCO to cheat like their predecessors a way to the CL cash to allow them to survive.

Survey on Clyde was over sixty percent against the fast tracking of the new club, even though it has 25,000 or so season ticket holders.
 
Albatross said:
So the MSM campaign to catapult the new club, with associate membership up the leagues is picking up momentum.

Question for the MSM, such as fat DJ and daft Guidi. Which of the current clubs at the top of Div 2 in the SFL do they say should be demoted to make room for SEVCO ? A club currently performing as one of the top 3 will have to take the place of SEVCO in the new second Div of the SFL, yet that very club will have to walk away from their rightful place earned by outstanding performance throughout the season in div 1 so that SEVCO can be catapulted unjustly and unmerited up the leagues, not for the sake of Scottish football, because it makes no diffrence to attendances between other clubs, but to allow SEVCO to cheat like their predecessors a way to the CL cash to allow them to survive.
Survey on Clyde was over sixty percent against the fast tracking of the new club, even though it has 25,000 or so season ticket holders.
Click to expand...

Well, Green is certainly trying to keep Sevco in the news and at the top of the agenda one way or another!

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-2295563/Rangers-promoted--Charles-Green.html
 
I was always under the impression that attendance was counted by tickets "sold" not actual bums on seats
 
Albatross said:
So the MSM campaign to catapult the new club, with associate membership up the leagues is picking up momentum.

Question for the MSM, such as fat DJ and daft Guidi. Which of the current clubs at the top of Div 2 in the SFL do they say should be demoted to make room for SEVCO ? A club currently performing as one of the top 3 will have to take the place of SEVCO in the new second Div of the SFL, yet that very club will have to walk away from their rightful place earned by outstanding performance throughout the season in div 1 so that SEVCO can be catapulted unjustly and unmerited up the leagues, not for the sake of Scottish football, because it makes no diffrence to attendances between other clubs, but to allow SEVCO to cheat like their predecessors a way to the CL cash to allow them to survive.

Survey on Clyde was over sixty percent against the fast tracking of the new club, even though it has 25,000 or so season ticket holders.
Click to expand...

I've been more kind to you than I should be, partly because we are loosely both on the same side - but you are ****ing mental alright.
 
MalteseMick said:
I've been more kind to you than I should be, partly because we are loosely both on the same side - but you are ****ing mental alright.
Click to expand...

You deem to be kind to me because we are on the same side........you, sir are a complete dullard. Maybe the air or water in Malta alters people's perspective into that of a timposter. Don't like what you read, then ignore it you prick.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back