My uncle worked at Hull Brewery for 20 years . It was brilliant . Me and my mates used to go and drink free ale !
I don't think so. It's more trying to get a definition of "coastal". i.e. As well as a city (1) obviously on the coast ( adjacent/abutting the sea), what about (2) cities on rivers (with estuaries) flowing into the sea. The debate seems to hinge on salinity/brackishness/ tidal penetration up said rivers. Hull's in the second category. Hence the debate. Throw some geology in there ( as I foolishly did), and the plot thickens !
It's not a Coastal City that much I know ! I've never known anybody refer to it as being on the coast until now
No. It seems some official office (mentioned in a post by someone above) uses either a high tide location or a point up the river where the swelling tide reaches maximum up-flow. Amount of salt content in the water at such points also comes into the equation. It's a tricky one. I'm for Hull being coastal (for other reasons too - geological + current) , yet others are not. What about Bristol ? On the coast ?
The English realm extends to the low water mark Obviously some rivers don’t have one, the Humber does Minerva is on the coast Done deal