Watching Anderson with the new ball vs Smith is absolute pure sexYeeeees Broady.
Watching Anderson with the new ball vs Smith is absolute pure sexYeeeees Broady.
A sticky wicket then ? Nudge nudge,Watching Anderson with the new ball vs Smith is absolute pure sex
No, please don't spoil it with such crassA sticky wicket then ? Nudge nudge,![]()
Aye, a little close to the edge, and silly. Bad hand action led to a full toss.No, please don't spoil it with such crass
Last session today is the first I've been able to watch live.
Real test cricket.
Gripping, enthralling, played to the max. No quarter given. Brutal.
But when Joe Root was hit on the head - three years to the day that Phil Hughes suffered his fatal blow - the Aussies reacted with admirable care and concern.
Excellent stuff. Steve Smith the difference though, I fear.
Doesn't this wicket flatten out? Not sure 150 would be enough?Decent start by England.
What we thinking then? Anything above 150 competitive?
Smith's innings the decisive part of this test - he's the difference between the 2 sides
I was being careful not to mention that!! Apparently our first half display was awful, but Lee Johnson has assembled a young hungry group of players (no-one over 28 in our side) and they showed a bit of character to turn things aroundWell that's us going 1-0 down, capitulated in the second innings, they're a bit like City do in the second half of game.
I was being careful not to mention that!! Apparently our first half display was awful, but Lee Johnson has assembled a young hungry group of players (no-one over 28 in our side) and they showed a bit of character to turn things around
Need to get something in Adelaide because I worry for us at the WACCA
One huge huge difference is Lyon vs Mo, with Lyon being able to tie and end down and look a lot more threatening it's allowed the aussies to play an extra batsmen, bowl their quicks in short bursts and has left England with an appalling 9, 10, jack. The English bowling looks shot and i'd have backed the aussies to chase 400 if we'd managed to put that many on the board.Smith's innings the decisive part of this test - he's the difference between the 2 sides
One huge huge difference is Lyon vs Mo, with Lyon being able to tie and end down and look a lot more threatening it's allowed the aussies to play an extra batsmen, bowl their quicks in short bursts and has left England with an appalling 9, 10, jack. The English bowling looks shot and i'd have backed the aussies to chase 400 if we'd managed to put that many on the board.
edit....there are, for me, a 2 really quite significant differences between the side:
- pace of the bowling attack - England had the best of the batting on the first day when the pitch nullified the aussie pace attack and didn't make them pay. If those 3 aussies keep fit we're ****ed as we don't have the pace to worry the aussies on quick pitches
- strength of the tail - will be the key defining factor in who wins this series, both teams have some star batsmen and some bang average ones, the aus first innings showed this with their last 3 wickets making over 100 runs, compare that to ours being blasted out last night for about 4, whichever team makes the most runs from 7 down will likely win the series, our only hope on this front is a 3 man seam attack, dropping Ball and bringing another bat in,but this will put a lot of pressure on Mo, who is possibly unfit after his side strain and bowling some bang ordinary stuff