Considering my point was that people blamed Phelan for ridiculously minor tactical things they considered to be 'incorrect' while there were quite obviously much bigger issues in play, you're just proving my point by saying it all over again.
Not for the first time I find your posts irrational and broadbrush.
Quite a few held views between the rock and the hard place you call the truth. Some didn't want MP, but accepted it as inevitable - that was certainly the case with me.
Those others, just like me, got behind him and only criticised his decisions when events made it necessary - this on a Hull City football forum - how very dare we?
MP rode his luck, he was out of his depth and just another passing punt by the odious twats. The issues that I, and others, highlighted were more than adequately proven to be justified by subsequent changes.
It may just have been fluke, but the changes made a difference - if made earlier, when it was obvious to some of us, then our relegation might not have been seen by some as inevitable. I never thought, until the Sunderland game that relegstion was inevitable, I simply thought Silvas away record and big game capitulation was poor.
I'm happy to apportion blame. Start with Bruce, Phelan, Silva and certain players, but, and you might be pleased to see this, I, just as with others on here, are capable of looking at tactical inadequacies and continuing to understand the inadequacies and hindrances that the odious twats who own the club present as an obstacle.
But the point is that posters were justified to comment that, despite the shambolic recruitment, Phelan and Silva could have made a better fist of their responsibilities.
You are welcome to your POV, but it is not as well thought through as you constantly demand we should accept. Your delivery certainly will annoy and alienate other posters who are similarly minded, with regards to the owners.
You're turning into a David Icke charactor; I hope you like mauve ...
