You know the score precious, sometimes we dont let the truth get in the way of a bit of skullduggery, 1999 and 2005 great achievements, Europe was very strong in 1999 and Milan were magic in 2005. Both had lots of luck but both teams went and played football. Chavsky did not play football and just got lucky no matter how many times drogs says they got 3, sure Liverpool beat em at at the nou twice, chavsky have had many chances to do that but never did even under jose. Messi essentially had a nightmare and still has nightmares about it, that and that alone is the only reason chelsea won it
Your team still disgraced english football I mean c'mon, if your team was spurs or stoke or even liverpool last year I would understand 10 defenders but the fkn cost of that team, Joke club that spends and buys its way to success, not a problem footy is a business but dont be proud of it u sh!t, thats just sad, still blaming friend for Ivan's idiocy?
Our '99 team won the league, your lot came 6th. As did Liverpool in 2005. The thread said teams that should not have won a CL, our '99 side was a million miles from being that. I say again, the team that should not have won the CL is Porto as we should not have had a perfectly good goal that was three yards on side disallowed.
I think so. Vague memories of him scoring two goals and being offside around seven or eight times as Juve tried to counter, and then went all out attack as we got the aggregate lead. Hmm...offside goal disallowed, or ghost goal and dive for a penalty in the final? Nah, Liverpool still deserve it less than Porto
More importantly you were not english champions when you qualified so stop talking bollox, it began from the season before, so, titmuch?
At least we were runners up. Not 4th like Liverpool were in 2005. Good work BBF, highlighting another reason Liverpool deserved it less
Ahh, I see you've at least strung some semblance of words together in an order that is understandable. Not pissed yet, you pikey leprechaun ****? **** off and eat some spuds, peasant.
Liverpool, ****test team ever to win it, lucky Carlo was always a bottler any other manager and it would have been 5-0,6-0. Porto were pretty **** as well
We did ride our luck this year but we deserved it overall after the liverpool semi final, 08 final, 09 robbery etc etc. Any team that goes 2-0 down away in a cl semi final 2nd leg to the best team in the world with 10 men and no captain or center backs and comes back to draw 2-2 deserves to win it, no other team in the world would have been able to do that
Certainly not United. They choke whenever they play BArca. Barca, however, just can't beat us. Seven games and counting
2 defeats to Barcelona and we choke when ever we play them lol. What he meant to say is United often give barcelona a game but recent encounters have gone the way of the Spanish side
I think you'll find what he meant to say is "I'm obsessed with Utd and think about them day and night"
All the chelsea fans are obsessed with United. Too the point a number of them have become buddies with the City fans ( all 2 of them ) on here. Together they are rewriting history. Also, apparently your team being incapable of playing football and getting related several times while nearly going bust is the sign of a team who deserves success. I dont think he knows United once fit that criteria.
When did United get related [sic] several times and nearly go bust several times? You have stated this on another thread but not answered the question. You said: 'They have also been through relegation, starved of success and seen times as baron and as harsh as any Chelsea or Manchester City fan. Are you aware on a number of occasions we almost went bankrupt, had to be bailed out? Probably not.' You got related [sic] once in modern memory. You know nothing about your club's history. Please tell us about the number the occassions you nearly went bankrupt.
who is going to educate this fool. apparently me saying it isnt good enough so will someone educate this plastic thanks
Relegated in 1922, 1931, 1937 and 1974 IIRC. And I think once when we were Newton Heath. Served with a winding up order in early 1900s, had to be bailed out. Bought out of receivership in the 1930s. Oh, I'm sorry, did you think football only began in 1970?
He does and he also along with others think United havent been through the ****. Some QPR fan thinks United have never been through a harsh patch or baron periods where success was none existent. Of course their reply is going to be...'were you alive then' or something like that.
