I didn't say you did call for his head - last season. You learnt your lesson from him proving you wrong at least twice before, when you DID call for his head. Damning with faint praise was your approach last season - an average manager I think you called him several times. An average manager that set up 90-95% of the framework that's bringing us success now. You also showed no negative response to his firing and were clearly going to fall over yourself to back his replacement, which, fortunately, is now being helped by positive results. The irony is, though, that most of those results are due to him sticking to the game plan and team set up by the previous regime, which you refuse to acknowledge! I'l ask you the same question I asked Big Fox - what positive changes has CR made to the team that was scoring goals for fun and keeping clean sheets during the last nine games last season?
Again, I will repeat that I am not part of an anti-Ranieri campaign. He comes across as a lovely bloke, and, as I've said in the post about which you probably haven't read, so I'll spell it out again when it comes to results so far: HE'S DONE AS WELL AS HE COULD HAVE. Not sure how that saying someone is doing as well as they possibly could can be construed as an anti campaign and I certainly don't remember you saying anything positive like that about Pearson - even when we ripped up the Championship, you questioned his ability to keep us up.
However, I report what I see, and I have seen elements that concern me. I did with Pearson too. No-one took me to task on that though, because I said many times that the positives outweighed the negatives and I was regarded as his supporter. Ranieri hasn't been at the club nearly long enough to win me over, plus, like many, I was nonplussed at his appointment, so now some are taking every negative comment I say as a personal insult. It's these people, which include yourself, which need to get a grip.
