Team for Saturday

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Obviously at 1 million, Lambert is better value than Fernando Torres. This was the question lost in the confusion. Interesting point...ignoring age difference and our great love for Rickie...would you swap Rickie for Torres?

Leaving aside the emotion and sentiment, and based purely in terms of their market value, yes I'd swap Rickie for Torres. We'd simply get more money if we were selling them and Torres is still worth more than Rickie. In terms of usefulness, form, reliability, in fact almost every other single playing factor, excluding longevity [age] I'd keep Rickie. In my opinion, at this point, Saints would still be getting out of the lower leagues if we hadn't signed Rickie Lambert. You could measure his value by that alone, if you want, and exclude his contribution this season, which has been excellent as well.
 
Always an admirer of Torres, but he has deteriorated since he joined Chelsea (and cut his hair). He's a player who needs either a new manager or, even better, a new club. I find it very hard to get past my love for Rickie with all he has done and all he contributes...why, oh why didn't he reach this standard five years ago!! He thinks he will be even better next year and I believe him, but time is still stalking him.
 
I would trade him for the 2009 Fernando Torres. The 2013 models are no comparison, Torres is a shadow of his former self, he really needs a change in scenery, Rickie is at the apex of his career.


Agree Mikey let's hope he doesnt turn it around tomorrow though!