Acun in that instance is both right and wrong. Who’s to say that based on what we saw earlier in preseason of Ivor that he didn’t replicate that in a crucial game during the run in? I’d still take the trust of the coaches who see the players every day as opposed to the owner who doesn’t.
It may well not be and hopefully it isnt, what I've heard may be wrong. As I've always said, I can only go on what I hear/am told. TWT!
No. He left by mutual consent. Which doesn’t mean there is anything more sinister than if he had stepped down.
First off, sorry to hear it affected you so badly. I hope you eventually manage to get over it. Then, ?? What you posted doesn't appear to make sense! Are you saying the club didn't actually sign Philogene after all? That he wasn't actually our player at all? That we didn't buy him for around £5mill and sell him for around £15mill+. And that Villa just for a laugh gave us £10mill or so profit on him? If not, what exactly are you saying that you were so right about?
I doubt the decision to stick with Allsop had anything to do with the other coaches. I'd be surprised if it wasn't simply that Rosenior himself made the decision to stick with Allsop, simple as.
There used to be an arcade machine in the amusements when I was young called Sidney Knows. Think that would make more sense than our Sydney.
So, you're making assumptions based on zero insight whatsoever. Sounds about right. A stopped clock is right twice a day...
I mean that’s complete ****ing nonsense. A. he’s made mistakes and is rightfully pulled on them (ie shota) B. People have been laying into him for ****ing ages about almost anything since LR left. load of tripe
Yes literally every single person on earth created an account and said they disagreed with me. It was a terrible time for me.
Help is available, must keep a burgeoning industry going. The views expressed in my posts are not necessarily mine.
The controller from the cab office says it allegedly involves women and beer. A toxic mix if not handled with caution.
My guess would be that Kesler was delegated to handle the fine print and details of transfer deals and some of the money, probably through agent fees, has conveniently ended up in his back pocket.
If there was anything dodgy about the Philogene deal, I think that Villa are the ones creating the dodginess, it wasn’t just Philogene they “sold” & bought back, but Cameron Archer too, they then “sold” him again to Southampton. Didn’t they & Everton both spend money on youth players from each other, just happening to be the same amount?