He was there for Everton, got all the plaudits so Bruce threw a tantrum and put him in the stands against Palace. After that Willock came in and couldn't stop scoring
Tbh that's all a secondary argument to the claim I made. All I'm saying is that there's been no problem since Bruce brought in Jones. I'm not intersted in the ifs buts and maybes surrounding why We were the 10th best side for the full duration of the current set up.
Yup. The test is a formality if separation is established. Staveley - Successful and well respected businesswoman. Reubens - Successful and well respected billionaires. Al Rumayyan - Internationally respected CEPO Mogren - same as Al Rumayyan Arbitration will include a stipulation that the test is applied quickly.
The club signs players and the manager uses them.. Like I say it doesn't matter because I'm not arguing about who deserves the credit im simply saying that things have been fine since Jones came in. Wouldnt you agree?
They can't if arbitration rules that it must be applied quickly. Arbitration can rule that there is no legal basis to stop the takeover
Yes. But it's short sighted to see Willocks goals have papered over the cracks. Even if we buy him he won't score every week again. So it's silly to just say everything's hunky dory let's stick with an idiot manager
Yes, we got a lucky break but we still need change. It's more to do with Willocks freak form than Jones
If we get a takeover change him, but otherwise there's no point changing.. Who's going to do better than Bruce and Jones did ie 10th for the full duration they've been working here together and it progressed to 7th over the last 11 game.
