I did. Or is English not your first language? And as I answered your question it would only be manners if you answered mine.
So basically the big 6 owners fall foul of one of the criteria listed above. And thus under the annual review should be removed from position. Right?
There seems to be a failed misunderstanding that these rules actually exist. I can tell you now from experience that people don't read rules
And the onus would be on the Premier League to prove what damages they’ve incurred as a result of their brand being brought into ‘disrepute’ by the actions of six clubs, hence there was never a solid case and they would have been trampled all over by the behemoth clubs that built that very brand in the first place. Slap on the wrist and a pathetic fine was as good as they were ever going to get.