Syria
- Thread starter Ciaran
- Start date
-
Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
-
This sums things up in a nutshell really.
You have sited a list of near misses between russian and western aircraft in Syria, and have claimed it as evidence of Russian Imperialism.
You seem to have missed one little factor out though.....
RUSSIA IS SYRIA'S ALLIE AND HAS BEEN INVITED THERE BY ITS GOVERNMENT
AMERICA IS NOT SYRIA'S ALLIE AND HAS NOT BEEN INVITED THERE BY ITS GOVERNMENT. BUT IT'S STILL THERE ANYWAY.
ERGO ....
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
See if you can finish it yourself, by replacing the x s with a rational conclusion
I think I'll pass, I have no intention of debating with someone who can't spell "Ally", or "Cited". Especially if that certain someone thinks it a good idea to try to prove a point by posting in BLOCK CAPITALS after failing to even look at the link he's trying argue about.
Last edited:
You can't spell ally so your point is invalidI think I'll pass, I have no intention of debating with someone who can't spell "Ally", or "Cited". Especially if that certain someone thinks it a good idea to try to prove a point by posting in BLOCK CAPITALS after failing to even look at the link he's trying argue about.
Who was moaning about ad hominem attacks earlier on this thread???
I know , he should have used italics and bold ...amateurI think I'll pass, I have no intention of debating with someone who can't spell "Ally", or "Cited". Especially if that certain someone thinks it a good idea to try to prove a point by posting in BLOCK CAPITALS after failing to even look at the link he's trying argue about.
I think I'll pass, I have no intention of debating with someone who can't spell "Ally", or "Cited". Especially if that certain someone thinks it a good idea to try to prove a point by posting in BLOCK CAPITALS after failing to even look at the link he's trying argue about.
I did **** up there admittedly.
I dont have time to analyse the attachment, and as you haven't either, we have no conclusion to draw from it.
I did read the document though, so I am aware of what it says and I can draw any conclusion I choose, but there is only one conclusion.
Russia constantly violates the airspace of numerous other countries...by accident apparently. Same as the Russian troops captured in Ukraine, they got lost.
Last edited:
Well done.
I did have a quick scan hrough, and i notice that many of the incidents that the article logs as a russian incursion, is actually an instance of american and western european aircraft close to russian aircraft in the baltics.
Which country is partly in the Baltics ?
Russia !
Oh, and btw, here's an article that explains that the number of incidents involving nato aircraft in and around russian airspace is far higher than the other way around :
https://www.rt.com/op-edge/234231-nato-russia-uk-planes/
No, he should have read the link before guessing what was on it.
Yeah, like you should try taking a look at a map sometime
Well done.
I did have a quick scan hrough, and i notice that many of the incidents that the article logs as a russian incursion, is actually an instance of american and western european aircraft close to russian aircraft in the baltics.
Which country is partly in the Baltics ?
Russia !
Oh, and btw, here's an article that explains that the number of incidents involving nato aircraft in and around russian airspace is far higher than the other way around :
https://www.rt.com/op-edge/234231-nato-russia-uk-planes/
You know what, I'm bored senseless but i'm not so bored that I can be bothered picking the lies out of a Russia Today article (of which there will be many).
If that's the route we're travelling how about I start posting quotes from The Sun, or National Enquirer?
Why would I be angry about your inablity to read a whole comment in it's entirety, before rushing to pick an argument you were ever only going to lose?
Yeah, like you should try taking a look at a map sometime
Says the man who tries to use RT as a reliable source of information.
It's taken me a while longer than normal but now I've got it, you are not playing with a full deck.
