1. Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Swp

Discussion in 'Queens Park Rangers' started by Busy Being Headhunted, Feb 2, 2013.

  1. inkedupp

    inkedupp Active Member

    Joined:
    Aug 10, 2011
    Messages:
    1,949
    Likes Received:
    20
    just a comparison, we're allowed slag off rob green because he lets in a few goals and as a keeper he's meant to stop them but we can't abuse swp because even though as a striker he can't score but does run about a bit?
    do me a favour..
     
    #21
  2. sb_73

    sb_73 Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2012
    Messages:
    31,217
    Likes Received:
    29,370
    I think thats the point Inky - he's not a striker and is not being played as one. He is being played as a chasing, harrying midfielder, a thankless role, especially as everyone is expecting him to get crosses in and score goals.

    I am not a fan, but we have to be fair, Harold obviously thinks he is his best option in this type of role. If we don't like it H should take the stick in my view, not SWP.
     
    #22
  3. El Pirata

    El Pirata Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2012
    Messages:
    2,331
    Likes Received:
    48
    So yesterday we had SWP who is not meant to be creative on the wing and both Derry and Mbia. So our only creative players were Adel and Townsend. I already said Harry made a big mistake with this one
     
    #23
  4. Ninj

    Ninj Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2011
    Messages:
    4,457
    Likes Received:
    3,136
    work colleague told me that SWP has effectively 3 good games per team he has played for. As far as I am concerned the goal against chelsea counts as one of those games so he owes us two more games. Never been a fan - won't knock the pace, but finally delivery and shooting is rubbish. Cannot understand why clubs have paid so much money for him - surely if he was so good, why haven't clubs tried to buy him from us?
     
    #24
  5. rangercol

    rangercol Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Mar 22, 2011
    Messages:
    36,051
    Likes Received:
    19,651
    Spot on. We have to stop playing him for his defensive work and get on the attack more.
     
    #25
  6. Busy Being Headhunted

    Busy Being Headhunted Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 17, 2012
    Messages:
    16,940
    Likes Received:
    9,791
    He was a waste of space, when Zamora came on for him we actually looked like we might score and Zamora didn't exactly do that much
     
    #26
  7. QPR Oslo

    QPR Oslo Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Sep 21, 2011
    Messages:
    21,723
    Likes Received:
    6,795
    Agree with that mostly - SWP's running did cause Norwich some problems and won us some free kicks. But we needed another striker on much earlier, from the first minute in fact! And it must have been a close choice between Mackie and SWP for who was going to make way for BZ when he eventually came on. I see Mackie and SWP as pretty similar, both run and run and work their socks off - Mackie is a bit more likely to score, and SWP is quicker, but playing both in the same 11 is 1 of them too many, and surely Mackie can't play lone striker again can he Harry? Surely as well Harry you ain't going to loan out DJ now? Where was Hoillet yesterday, I read he was fit again. He has a few goals in him, what we need surely.
     
    #27

Share This Page