I don’t think they are good enough to beat the Swans but Stoke would certainly love to give their fans the opportunity to celebrate and avoid the “cheerio, cheerio, cheerio..” from the Home fans. They will be trying hard to win.
There is no evidence that the Stoke players have any enmity towards Hughes...they will want to finish well for their fans. And (as pointed out by Channonfodder) they will want to take Swansea down with them and avoid having to sit there with a team wildly celebrating. That must be awful
https://www.footballfancast.com/pre...e-should-be-a-southampton-starter-next-season Article pointing out the contribution Hoedt made on Tuesday.
Note that they say he should be a starter "as long as he's alongside a dominant partner" I think this could be said of all our CBs. That's why we currently need 3. For me he wouldn't be the no1 partner if we get that new CB. That place is for Jack and Jan to compete for
Stoke to lose 7-0 on purpose and City to beat us 3-0. We go down but we are all loaded as everyone has bet on Saints getting relegated at huge odds. Will be all @The Liebherr Legacy fault after his terrible attempts at trolling the Swansea board.
Terrible? One of them got so wound up he's still pm-ing me abuse now despite me not responding for 24 hours Another resorted to calling everyone a nonce and using racist language. At least they're not getting wound up though. It also killed a few hours of my night shift
Fair point on the ban thing but if a board seemingly allows racist language then its probably borderline impossible to get banned. If we somehow miraculously go down then I ****ing ain't
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/44064957 Swansea saying they wont renew Carvalhal's contract. Stoke vs Swansea might come down to which team is more determined to throw the game.
I made a mistake and read some of it. Some people moan that not enough other teams’ fans are made welcome here.... I wonder why? None of those were WUMs though eh?