For a start that's not on about anything remotely similar to their goal. It's about whether a player standing in an offside position is affecting play without the ball. And it was definitely offside yesterday Bruce played the ball, it wasn't a rebound, just a terrible header. What did Bruce say? Seems as though he was back to his usual ****ish lying self.
Quite pathetic to call me a dickhead just because I had a difference of opinion over what's clearly a grey area and you disagreed with me. I am a referee and I was taught that is offside. Another way to look at it was naugton headed it over the top and Gomis made a movement towards the ball, so he was involved in active play. I don't care if you disagree as we deserved to lose and we should have defended it far better anyway but I stand by my original post, which wasn't condescending or aggressive in any way. Unlike your reply.
I'm afraid bullying is a necessary evil at times. Feeble-minded ****s like you and Wade need to be reminded of their place in the pecking order.
It was worse than Cat or Mole's. If I remember rightly, he didn't really get much of the man and his studs were not up.
Ha ha yes I see Calming down now but that was nowhere near good enough Got to get Jak or Harps in it's be nice to have a goalie who's not a complete liability
Crikey, looks like I missed a belting evening on here. I think being out getting pissed was a fine alternative. Here's my review: Game - **** McShane - legend Wade - prick Thudds/HullCityAFC/SCBcopy - ubercunt
If you look up 'complete liability', it may well say 'Eldin Jakupovic'. Harper would be a much more secure option.
