Oh dear. That's disingenuous and I'm being polite. A group of us were critical of Guidolin's tactics yesterday during the last 10 minutes whilst giving him huge credit for the earlier part of the game. I understand the opposite argument even if I disagree. You and others then jump on "the moaners" who are "never satisfied" yadda yadda yadda. Pray tell, who were you referring to if not those who were critical of Guidolin? Try and answer that one
I think you need to take a step back pal and realise how you're both acting, You're being really condescending and obnoxious
I'm not your pal. Having trouble with the question? I can re-phrase if you like. You started this crap. Let's see if you can finish it.
Ok, I was referring to the people who constantly moan even when we win. To expect a full 90 mins of dominance over Chelsea is unrealistic.
1: Who moans "constantly even when we win"? Is there such an animal? There are always flaws in a performance and there's nothing wrong with pointing them out provided credit is given for the overall performance. That was done. 2: Who has said we should have dominated Chelsea for 90 minutes? The possession stats prove that we didn't and there isn't a poster who would say that - or expect it.
Ok, 1. Its a general statement I gather information fro multiple sources, Planet swans, Youtube, Pub talk, etc..... (i have stated this) 2. I think you're being pedantic and over analytical
Oh...my bad. Profuse apologies. I should have realised you were referring to posters on OTHER forums.
You didn't say this when you made the statement and it was a statement posted on this forum with no links to the pub, you tube or planet swans. If you had used that in your post no one would have responded, but when you post that on here with no mention of any other sources then people who have mentioned their concerns have every right to respond.
