Four great goals there, including the penalty because he stitched him up like a kipper with that pause. No idea if it was a pen or not but if he got the ball it wasn't although these days any slide tackle is a foul if you make any contact at all. Bullshit if you ask me. I love how two footed Gooch and Maja are both have scored loads on their left this season. Next thing to work on with Maja is heading, can't knock him too much but he should have had three easy. I noticed McLaughlin's long kicks were more accurate than I remember and should create a few chances when Wyke is back.
It happened right in front me and Raw, they were running towards us. McGeady got the touch, defender got the man. Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk
That's 100% btw, you can even see on the highlights it's the outside of his left boot that steers the ball out of the path of the defenders tackle. Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk
Do either of you have a highlight to look at instead of RTB's? I've paused that at every split second and it's inconclusive because at the moment he goes in their bodies cover the incident.
From the Highlights I thought the defender went in from the right hand side (slightly behind) and seemed to get the ball. Will happily stand corrected from those that were there and I don't care either way. Set us up for a cracking performance.
Soft because it wasn't a dangerous tackle (not studs up or both feet off the ground) , or deliberately vindictive and he got the ball. But you aren't allowed to tackle from behind, so it was technically was a penalty. But haven't watched the highlights yet, so might change my opinion yet
Further to the debate on Josh Maja, I've just watched the match highlights and his goal was real class. when we won the ball back Josh was five yards inside his own half and his only thought was to get back up front, great credit to Matthews who picked up his run and as soon as Josh got the ball his twist and turn to seat the defender on his backside and his curling left foot shot into the top corner was beauty in its execution. I've said he doesn't work hard enough without the ball but he's made me eat my words here. Well done Josh.
Not bothered really. Ref gave it and even without we’d have won 3-2. Linesman in front of the east stand missed a blatant handball by Maguire just outside our box!! Was embarrassing
I know what you mean but it doesn't work like that. The first goal always makes a massive difference and it was the catalyst to bag 3 in ten minutes. I'm not bothered either way, mind.
I did but it was more of a gut feeling and judging the speed of the play. I just cant see when the contact happens because the players body positions cover that.
Lol. You sound like me!! Had we lost, I’d have said exactly the same!! Watched the highlights and I can’t see anything to suggest one way or the other whether it was a penalty. As I’ve said before you don’t know what might have happened had he not given it. May have ended 3-2 or we may still have scored first. They ran out of steam after their 2nd I thought. Looked like they’d given as much as they could. Moore looks a good player at this level
Yeah, my mate said he looked like he can play at a higher level. How did Mowatt play? Centre midfielder? **** it, after some of the decisions this season, we'll take that.
Looked ok. Roker report bugged up a Honeyman, I honestly thought he was poor most of the game with moments of good play. Not a 9/10 fir me but shows how different people can see things so differently
Nope, the highlight isn't great is it. but I did have the best view in the house. Next to Raw and he'll vouch Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk
Fair play, mate. You couldn't have been at a better angle. Not sure if you seen my status on the business account but I'm still here. I don't think I'm getting away until Friday.
**** man. What's the crack of you don't mind me asking? Check the boxing by day thread fella, don't know how to tag you in on this phone. Sent from my Moto G (5) using Tapatalk
Trans activists send out free breast binders to 13-year-olds in unmarked packages... so their parents don't find out Ultra tight garments can cause 'horrendous' health problems for wearers The binders can increase the chances of punctured lungs and breathing issues They are used by a growing number of girls to disguise their breasts By SANCHEZ MANNING FOR THE MAIL ON SUNDAY PUBLISHED: 22:00 GMT, 1 December 2018 | UPDATED: 22:00 GMT, 1 December 20 A transgender charity is giving girls as young as 13 potentially dangerous breast-flattening devices without telling their parents. The ultra–tight garments can cause ‘horrendous’ health problems including breathing and breastfeeding difficulties, chronic back pain and broken ribs, increasing the chance of a punctured lung. They are used by a growing number of girls who believe they are the wrong sex to disguise their breasts and make them look like boys. please log in to view this image +4 The 'Flat Chest Breast Binder' can be purchased online for as little as £4 Now a Mail on Sunday investigation has exposed how a publicly funded organisation is secretly sending the controversial chest binders to schoolgirls in unmarked packages so that parents are kept in the dark. An undercover reporter posing as a 13-year-old schoolgirl contacted Manchester based MORF, part of the LBGT Foundation, after an angry mother told us that the group had sent her 14-year-old daughter a chest binder without consulting her. After two short phone calls to the helpline number on its website, our investigator was told a chest binder would be sent in the post free of charge and with no indication of what the package contained. Always here to help a fellow mackem , enjoy
