Transfer Rumours Summer transfers

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Is this a good thread?

  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .
Chief said:
Like that uber brilliant keeper that was world class but you didn't want and only Brentford showed an interest in?

No one is paying top dollar for Elliott, as Liverpool clearly don't see him as good enough themselves.
Click to expand...
**** you know about world class keepers ffs

Kellehers better than Onana<laugh>
 
Chief said:
Like that uber brilliant keeper that was world class but you didn't want and only Brentford showed an interest in?

No one is paying top dollar for Elliott, as Liverpool clearly don't see him as good enough themselves.
Click to expand...
Kelleher is very good and I was surprised at the fee but he did have only a year left on contract.

Elliott is different imo, he's good enough to get in any top team. I'm not happy with him leaving but Slot doesn't seem to rate him.

All opinion of course.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sucky
luvgonzo said:
Kelleher is very good and I was surprised at the fee but he did have only a year left on contract.

Elliott is different imo, he's good enough to get in any top team. I'm not happy with him leaving but Slot doesn't seem to rate him.

All opinion of course.
Click to expand...
Chief will expect a fee of around 50m for garnacho.

But we won't get paid well for elliot.

Haters gonna hate innit
 
luvgonzo said:
Kelleher is very good and I was surprised at the fee but he did have only a year left on contract.

Elliott is different imo, he's good enough to get in any top team. I'm not happy with him leaving but Slot doesn't seem to rate him.

All opinion of course.
Click to expand...


That's right, and so here the point; if Slot doesn't rate him (clearly) , who is going to over pay for him?

I'd also say Newcastle quite within their rights to say **** off if he's offered as a make weight for a player they don't want to sell.

No other club in the league wants you lot to have Isak either, so they aren't going to help you fund it.
 
Hey, steady folks…..

this is a safe space for mocking the black and white mackems.
 
  • Like
Reactions: luvgonzo
Sucky said:
Chief will expect a fee of around 50m for garnacho.

But we won't get paid well for elliot.

Haters gonna hate innit
Click to expand...

See above re Elliot.

Amorim doesn't want or rate Garnacho. He can go for peanuts for all I/we care.

Ditto Sancho, ditto Rashford.
 
Chief said:
See above re Elliot.

Amorim doesn't want or rate Garnacho. He can go for peanuts for all I/we care.

Ditto Sancho, ditto Rashford.
Click to expand...
Yeh you're not selling any of them while they're on mega bucks so great business from the financial joke that is utd
 
Peej said:
Hey, steady folks…..

this is a safe space for mocking the black and white mackems.
Click to expand...
Getting boring that.

Chief's thinly disguised agression is there for the poking
 
luvgonzo said:
Kelleher is very good and I was surprised at the fee but he did have only a year left on contract.

Elliott is different imo, he's good enough to get in any top team. I'm not happy with him leaving but Slot doesn't seem to rate him.

All opinion of course.
Click to expand...

Mate - Elliot would not get into the starting midfield of Citeh, Arsenal or Chelsea ...
 
Chief said:
That's right, and so here the point; if Slot doesn't rate him (clearly) , who is going to over pay for him?

I'd also say Newcastle quite within their rights to say **** off if he's offered as a make weight for a player they don't want to sell.

No other club in the league wants you lot to have Isak either, so they aren't going to help you fund it.
Click to expand...
Nobody has to overpay but we're not going to sell him on the cheap either.

As fans you have ideas of figures but let's face it they are not often correct.

With the Newcastle thing it's not helping us fund it, I'm just saying I rate the player so they'd do well to get him included IF they are going to sell.
 
luvgonzo said:
Opinion. He'd be up against Odengaard at Arsenal so a tough task, Chelsea he'd be in over Pedro imo. City he's up against an inconsistent Foden.
Click to expand...
Foden has just had a bad season after four of high standards.
 
luvgonzo said:
Opinion. He'd be up against Odengaard at Arsenal so a tough task, Chelsea he'd be in over Pedro imo. City he's up against an inconsistent Foden.
Click to expand...

It's not Pedro he'd be up against ... more Fernandes, Caicedo, Palmer and Lavia ... and he ain't winning against any of them ...
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back