Transfer Rumours Summer transfers

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!

Is this a good thread?

  • Total voters
    13
  • Poll closed .
KingHotspur said:
Absolutely ****e too but everyone knows that about Spurs. Spurs record signing wouldn’t make the top 6 of Utd record signings though.

It’s not a dig, just shows how hard it is to sign good players, even the mega expensive ones can go badly wrong.
Click to expand...

It is and as I've said before we've had a complete nobhead in Eddie Woodward spending our cash for the past decade. So players like Sanchez, Lukaku, Pogba were him thinking the club should be the next galacticos, the dickhead.

On Antony, I'll echo Chief's point. Very weird how players are classed as flops in one season. Having watched him play all season there's defo a talented player there but will need to develop. I'll also add his development as a wide player might be helped playing in a side with a CF like. That's a novel idea I know, but could help. All in all I'm glad we bought him and looking forward to how he does this year.
 
Treble said:
It is and as I've said before we've had a complete nobhead in Eddie Woodward spending our cash for the past decade. So players like Sanchez, Lukaku, Pogba were him thinking the club should be the next galacticos, the dickhead.

On Antony, I'll echo Chief's point. Very weird how players are classed as flops in one season. Having watched him play all season there's defo a talented player there but will need to develop. I'll also add his development as a wide player might be helped playing in a side with a CF like. That's a novel idea I know, but could help. All in all I'm glad we bought him and looking forward to how he does this year.
Click to expand...
The hypocrisy of this statement <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: BobbyD, Dier Hard, Sucky and 1 other person
You must log in or register to see media
You must log in or register to see images
 
  • Like
Reactions: Munson.
So….. in context. Man Utd fans having shouted their tits off at Middle Eastern oil state clubs, twerked their arses off at the end of the season with dreams of Qatari state ownership and M’Bappe and the reality is the glazers and a Poundland Haaland for the same price as the real Haaland . Or am I mistaken? <laugh>
 
  • Like
Reactions: FadgewackeR, BobbyD, Solid Air and 2 others
Magdadlorian said:
So….. in context. Man Utd fans having shouted their tits off at Middle Eastern oil state clubs, twerked their arses off at the end of the season with dreams of Qatari state ownership and M’Bappe and the reality is the glazers and a Poundland Haaland for the same price as the real Haaland . Or am I mistaken? <laugh>
Click to expand...

If you genuinely think City only paid Haaland's 'release clause', uncontested, then you're dafter than you look.

How about his million euros a week wages, or do these things only count when it's a United transfer?
 
  • Like
Reactions: duggie2000 and Spurlock
Magdadlorian said:
So….. in context. Man Utd fans having shouted their tits off at Middle Eastern oil state clubs, twerked their arses off at the end of the season with dreams of Qatari state ownership and M’Bappe and the reality is the glazers and a Poundland Haaland for the same price as the real Haaland . Or am I mistaken? <laugh>
Click to expand...
Dont have that **** @Treble
 
  • Like
Reactions: Mick O'Toon
Roy Munson said:
All the things you could have disputed and you've gone with the actual amount.
Click to expand...

So, even if the £72 million fee for Hojlund was correct (it isn't, the transfer fee is €70million), are you suggesting that Haaland's was £42million?

If not, what exactly is it you're saying as I don't get it?!?
 
Chief said:
So, even if the £72 million fee for Hojlund was correct (it isn't, the transfer fee is €70million), are you suggesting that Haaland's was £42million?

If not, what exactly is it you're saying as I don't get it?!?
Click to expand...

Including the add ons it's like 80 million mate.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back