He's 10 months younger and was, IMO, no better than Holt in his first PL season. For a fee likely to be in the region of 5m..no thanks!

lol no need to get that angry about it.NO! NO! NO!
****ing bloke is pissing me off he can stick it up his arse if you ask me! Piss off and ****ing sort your life out, you bastard.
Hooper this, Hooper that. **** right off!
Lambert is quicker, younger, stronger and probably has slightly more technical ability than Holt. Plus he is pretty mean from a dead ball situation.
If we can get someone in Holt's mould but slightly better than him, then I say go for it. Lambert would be great back up to RvW.

Too true we should get him should never had let Holty go but think he wanted away
Interestingly Higuain is having a medical at Napoli. Interest from they was quoted as only of the reasons our deal for FQ was held up. Wonder if this might help.
I also wondered if the Higuain medical might alter FQ's thinking. I agree that we need a more flexible forward than Lambert, as the days of the 'target man' forward are diminishing. Without wanting to overstoke the fire, the BBC is apparently reporting that we have matched QPR's bid for Hooper. Haven't checked myself but am about to.
Well I can't find that
Crrect me if I'm wrong - but didn't Darren Huckerby take quite a pay cut to come and play for Norwich?? If Hooper really wants to play for us, then he can tell his agent to 'take a hike' and he'll come to CR. I don't want us to be 'held to ransom' over this and think we'd be better off going for another player!!