Summer transfer window

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
Status
Not open for further replies.
Libby said:
Richarlison is no where near as bad as being made out on here. Double figures in a terrible Everton team last year and stepped it up at the end to almost single handedly save them so got character too.

You'd have to think he'd improve in a better team and under one of best managers in the world too?

£60m is absolutely crazy money mind, as was the £50m that Everton paid for him for that matter. All transfer fees are inflated though and heading into his prime year's and giving good back up to Son then I think he's a decent signing.

Fancy Spurs for top 3 and a cup next year. Unless this means they're selling Kane <whistle>
Click to expand...

I don’t think he’s a bad player, I just can’t ****ing stand him. From a purely playing perspective he’s miles better than Lucas and Bergwijn and provides good competition for Kane and Son which we’ve been crying out for for years.

As for Kane, I think his window to go was last summer, wouldn’t be completely surprised if he inks a new deal this summer once we’ve finished our business… that’s what I’d hope for anyway.
 
Libby said:
Richarlison is no where near as bad as being made out on here. Double figures in a terrible Everton team last year and stepped it up at the end to almost single handedly save them so got character too.

You'd have to think he'd improve in a better team and under one of best managers in the world too?

£60m is absolutely crazy money mind, as was the £50m that Everton paid for him for that matter. All transfer fees are inflated though and heading into his prime year's and giving good back up to Son then I think he's a decent signing.

Fancy Spurs for top 3 and a cup next year. Unless this means they're selling Kane <whistle>
Click to expand...

I agree mate ... whilst admittedly I was winding old Ponky up yesterday, Richarlison was indeed a handful for anyone when playing for 2 quite average Prem outfits ... with the service he'll get at the Spuds he'll do very well ...

Gabriel Jesus was pretty bang average at the best club in the Prem with Pep often opting to play without a striker rather than start him ... go figure.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dier Hard
PINKIE said:
He never really got the game time he deserved at City. He’ll be a regular starter at Arsenal so I’d expect him to be more consistent.

Digging up international stats to try and justify spunking £60m on him lol. And even then Jesus has still scored more for Brazil <laugh>
Click to expand...

Au contraire Madame Ponky ... he did get the game time he 'deserved' at Citeh ... they always had better options ...
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock and Dier Hard
PINKIE said:
He never really got the game time he deserved at City. He’ll be a regular starter at Arsenal so I’d expect him to be more consistent.

Digging up international stats to try and justify spunking £60m on him lol. And even then Jesus has still scored more for Brazil <laugh>
Click to expand...

Did he deserve more game time? You honestly think if he was as good as you think Pep wouldn’t have utilised him more? If he was a serious baller then he wouldn’t be leaving City.

He’s played 20 games more, you’d like to think he has more goals <laugh>.

You do realise though you’ve spent £45m on a backup player who had just 1 year remaining, right? Bayern paid less for Mane who was in a similar situation and he’s 10x the player Jesus is.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Spurls has single handedly and unexpectedly bigged up Richarlison to the extent that other fans are now sticking up for the transfer.

You must log in or register to see images
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE and Spurlock
Dier Hard said:
Did he deserve more game time? You honestly think if he was as good as you think Pep wouldn’t have utilised him more? If he was a serious baller then he wouldn’t be leaving City.

He’s played 20 games more, you’d like to think he has more goals <laugh>.

You do realise though you’ve spent £45m on a backup player who had just 1 year remaining, right? Bayern paid less for Mane who was in a similar situation and he’s 10x the player Jesus is.
Click to expand...

Yup ... only time he's really showed up against us was when we were down to bare bones...

Sucky said:
<laugh>

12 a season aint plenty bro
Click to expand...

Firmino?

...but, but, but <wah>
 
  • Like
Reactions: Spurlock
Don't worry the goons buying man city rejects is funny too.
 
Dier Hard said:
You paid £37.5m with £12.5m in add ons, how you not even know your own team’s deals <laugh>
Click to expand...
36, 37 same fukin thing<laugh>

The 12.5 is in bonuses btw. For winning things, scoring goals ect

Bargain for what we got.

Richarlison not so much<whistle>
 
I reckon the spurs lads should put their money where their mouf is.

Diaz to to have more g/a than serial grass eater Richarlison next season.

Usernames for a year.

Lets have it @Spurlock @Dier Hard
 
  • Like
Reactions: PINKIE
Sucky said:
36, 37 same fukin thing<laugh>

The 12.5 is in bonuses btw. For winning things, scoring goals ect

Bargain for what we got.

Richarlison not so much<whistle>
Click to expand...

And £10m of the £60m for Richarlison is bonuses, lol.

Diaz been good, don’t think he’ll be as good as Mane though, Mane was ****ing insane at times. Fantastic player and will be missed from Prem.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Sucky
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back