I'm sure there must be a screenshot somewhere of a "Isak is a non-starter" post.
I'm sure there must be a screenshot somewhere of a "Isak is a non-starter" post.
Shelvey scored against you last season, you can have him back. £100m ought to do it. Or maybe Van Dijk plus Salah swap deal.
No, I agree that would be disappointing - unless we get someone else in as well, of Maddison ilk.I'm gonna be elated with Isak.
Is it then wrong to be slightly disappointed if Paqueta goes to Wet Spam?
I'm sure there must be a screenshot somewhere of a "Isak is a non-starter" post.
Come on! You were Up for HamzaWe could of only dreamed of this **** a year ago.
I was even willing to pay the final £5 towards his 1 million loan agreement. Bruce was to busy in Greggs to pick up my phone call, lazy twatCome on! You were Up for Hamza
. Imagine this a year ago man......what a time to be alive !!Some Watford fans seem to think Pedro is more of a natural 10 than a 9.We're almost certainly playing 4-3-3 now, it's ingrained I reckon. The weak link so far has been CF, RW and RCM. Isak solves the first, Pedro becomes understudy to Almiron who has solved the RW problem himself, which leaves RCM - and, at a push, RCB. Gallagher would be ideal in RCM, he's better than Willock and WAY better than Longstaff. But I don't know if Howe sees Anderson as having enough to sort that out?
Would RCB become a priority, because we have Schar/Lascelles, or do we leave it at Isak/Pedro now?
If Isak comes off and he's our record signing at £58m i'm just getting a tad erect at who would come in to break that record transfer fee. Imagine this a year ago man......what a time to be alive !!
Reckons no Paquetá
Bruno is somewhere crying
You must log in or register to see media
I’d rather spend the extra and get MaddisonPacqueta goes to West Ham for 40m, then when they go down we'll take him for 20m if he's any good