Transfer Rumours Summer Transfer Window 2023

  • Please bear with us on the new site integration and fixing any known bugs over the coming days. If you can not log in please try resetting your password and check your spam box. If you have tried these steps and are still struggling email [email protected] with your username/registered email address
  • Log in now to remove adverts - no adverts at all to registered members!
If you can find 3 minutes worth

Well, he's scored 13. goals for us and provided 18 assists, so that alone would typically take about 7 minutes on these highlights reels. Let alone any other good play that didn't lead to an end product.

So yeah.

But that"s my point, these highlights reels can be deceptive about a player's overall contribution.
 
Well, he's scored 13. goals for us and provided 18 assists, so that alone would typically take about 7 minutes on these highlights reels. Let alone any other good play that didn't lead to an end product.

So yeah.

But that"s my point, these highlights reels can be deceptive about a player's overall contribution.
That’s his career then? 7 minutes. This lad has 3 minutes with many more years to go
 
Good Shout, wasn't aware of that but seems true - no idea what the age limit is but I presume anyone U18 can be bought into the academy without impacting FFP...

"FFP mandates that clubs must break even, and at the same time it exempts a number of costs from the calculation. These include infrastructure spending (like the finance costs of building a new stadium), investment in community schemes (school outreach programmes etc.) and women’s football as well as the full cost of youth development. These expenditures were believed to not be the kind of things that clubs should be penalised for. In the case of youth development, though, what it means is that Premier League clubs can spend as much as they like on their academies without having pressure to cut costs – like transfer fees or player wages – to be FFP‑compliant. And, to add to this incentive, while academy costs are excluded from the FFP calculation, income from sales of academy graduates is included in the profit calculation. It means that not only are significant operating costs excluded from the FFP calculation – meaning there’s no constraint on the number of youngsters in the academy – but the club can also boost their total FFP‑relevant income with player sales. The club is winning in both cases. They can spend as much as they can afford on player development, scooping up young players from around the world, and, if they can then sell them on, they can spend the extra on paying your first team. The more they spend scouting and improving players, then, the more they can get back into the club’s performance on the pitch, even if those youngsters never actually play for the club."

Not sure you’re reading that right? You can spend what you like in youth development but that doesn’t mean you can spend money on transfer fees and put it under that category. A transfer fee is a transfer fee. Doesn’t matter how old they are.
 
Dunno, ask Kloppy, apparently we can sign mega stars because we have no ceilings, but he does and so has to go bargain hunting instead. Appatently.

Was a serious question that’s all. Didn’t think you’d signed any one so far this window.
 
Well, the transfer window hasn't offically opened yet, so great observation. <applause><applause>

So you haven’t signed anyone? So the ‘another’ bit was totally pointless?

Not sure why getting all sarcastic about it, was a question as didn’t think you’d signed anyone and turns out you haven’t.
 
  • Like
Reactions: haslam and Obi Wan
So you haven’t signed anyone? So the ‘another’ bit was totally pointless?

Not sure why getting all sarcastic about it, was a question as didn’t think you’d signed anyone and turns out you haven’t.
It's a football forum, every comment gets a sarcastic response.

Deems da rulz innit. <laugh>

Don't take it personally.