Why do Premiership sides see potential in him and our staff dont? That's concerning.
Chelsea have about a hundred players on their books, the vast majority of which will never see the light of day in a Chelsea shirt!
Why do Premiership sides see potential in him and our staff dont? That's concerning.
I posted something on this earlier - he was offered professional terms, but turned the offer down - "The striker was one of nine City scholars offered professional terms at the end of last season but it appears the youngster will be heading elsewhere this summer. City would be entitled to compensation, and a percentage of any future transfer fee, if Ashley-Seal rejects a professional contract offered by Norwich."Why do Premiership sides see potential in him and our staff dont? That's concerning.
Please God, don't let this be true...
http://readnorwich.com/2017/07/20/norwich-interested-in-re-signing-snodgrass/

Thanks for the link JM.I posted something on this earlier - he was offered professional terms, but turned the offer down - "The striker was one of nine City scholars offered professional terms at the end of last season but it appears the youngster will be heading elsewhere this summer. City would be entitled to compensation, and a percentage of any future transfer fee, if Ashley-Seal rejects a professional contract offered by Norwich."
Read all about it - http://www.edp24.co.uk/sport/norwic...th-premier-league-champions-chelsea-1-5114451
He has been offered a contract which he has not signed. That is failing to see potential in him? If you are going to lambast the club over something, at least be factually accurate.Why do Premiership sides see potential in him and our staff dont? That's concerning.
He has been offered a contract which he has not signed. That is failing to see potential in him? If you are going to lambast the club over something, at least be factually accurate.
JM posted the article after I posted that. Although we don't know what kind of contract he was offered.He has been offered a contract which he has not signed. That is failing to see potential in him? If you are going to lambast the club over something, at least be factually accurate.
Someones pants are a bit tight.You must log in or register to see images
So did they !![]()
This is why we shouldn't sell Jerome.
http://www.edp24.co.uk/sport/norwic...and-here-are-the-stats-to-prove-why-1-5115749
We could swoop in for Grabban?Selling him would be poor business imo - I know he has his detractors on here and has goofed some good chances but his record is pretty impressive nonetheless, he works his ass off for the team, rarely gets injured and hardly ever gets booked let alone sent off. It would be folly to sell him unless we have a younger clone of him lined up from the second tier of the Bundesliga.

We could swoop in for Grabban?![]()
He was a clinical finisher
Bah!
A new signing for the academy, 16 year old Icelandic midfielder Ísak Snær Þorvaldsson. That's definitely one to test Canary Call!

A bit more on our new academy signing, as well as a second academy signing just announced:A new signing for the academy, 16 year old Icelandic midfielder Ísak Snær Þorvaldsson. That's definitely one to test Canary Call!
I am fairly certain the rules say that any club can only have one "Dave" on its books at any one time.Another "Dave"![]()