They announced to the fans that they cleared the dept a few promotions ago...Are you being serious. 10 years ago we had so much debt that we were in danger of going out of business. The next 5 years was spent clearing that debt and the next 4 years we spent large sums either trying to get promotion or trying to avoid relegation. If you care to look at the accounts you will see that we only made a small profit in one of those 4 seasons. Last year we are budgeting for a loss of £15m and next year we lose the parachute payment of £40m. Quite simply we have to spend £55m less next season than we did last and we won't achieve that by putting 10p on the price of a pie!! We have a new wage structure and obviously we will sell any existing player on a higher contract than that if a suitable offer is made and replace them with a player within the new wage structure which means cheapies and loans. The money raised by selling players will go into the kitty and, as you say, the days of big fees and wages are well and truly over. To do anything else risks financial ruin. Perhaps the Board can be accused of giving too much money to Hughton and Neil but that is hindsight and I can only imagine the uproar there would have been at the time if the Managers had asked for the funds and the Board had refused.
I don't think anyone has been given too much money. That's what p*sses me off.Are you being serious. 10 years ago we had so much debt that we were in danger of going out of business. The next 5 years was spent clearing that debt and the next 4 years we spent large sums either trying to get promotion or trying to avoid relegation. If you care to look at the accounts you will see that we only made a small profit in one of those 4 seasons. Last year we are budgeting for a loss of £15m and next year we lose the parachute payment of £40m. Quite simply we have to spend £55m less next season than we did last and we won't achieve that by putting 10p on the price of a pie!! We have a new wage structure and obviously we will sell any existing player on a higher contract than that if a suitable offer is made and replace them with a player within the new wage structure which means cheapies and loans. The money raised by selling players will go into the kitty and, as you say, the days of big fees and wages are well and truly over. To do anything else risks financial ruin. Perhaps the Board can be accused of giving too much money to Hughton and Neil but that is hindsight and I can only imagine the uproar there would have been at the time if the Managers had asked for the funds and the Board had refused.
To perhaps draw a distinction that might not be true:They announced to the fans that they cleared the dept a few promotions ago...
£2M apparently the fee. I think that's smart business. Worth the risk, especially after selling a striker for £15M.He only had one decent season at Ipswich with many poor ones at Ipswich and Sunderland!
£2M apparently the fee. I think that's smart business. Worth the risk, especially after selling a striker for £15M.
Haha!Nottingham is a bit too far from the sea to use him for donkey rides on the beach! He is one player I would not support our team going for!
Pretend Naismith could play as a striker.Sunderland also interested in Jerome. They need a goalkeeper as well, tell them McGovern is available but lay off CJ.
Holt was 28 when we signed him, Murphy is 34! Combined with his undoubtedly higher wage demands, I certainly wouldn't be keen.Haha!
People said that about Holty!
Nor would I. But I think he'll do a job for Forest.Holt was 28 when we signed him, Murphy is 34! Combined with his undoubtedly higher wage demands, I certainly wouldn't be keen.
Sunderland also interested in Jerome. They need a goalkeeper as well, tell them McGovern is available but lay off CJ.
Just seen this - http://www.pinkun.com/norwich-city/...th-premier-league-champions-chelsea-1-5114451
If he feels he wants to leave, there's not much we can do!!!
Hmmm...interesting.We are interested in taking Snoddy back on loan.
He would be on high wages and frustrating to watch and a step backwards in my opinion taking up a starting place .
I hope it's bullshit.
http://readnorwich.com/2017/07/20/norwich-interested-in-re-signing-snodgrass/
Never go back. Ain't that right Mr Fleck, Mr M Walker ...and R Snodgrass.We are interested in taking Snoddy back on loan.
He would be on high wages and frustrating to watch and a step backwards in my opinion taking up a starting place .
I hope it's bullshit.
We are interested in taking Snoddy back on loan.
He would be on high wages and frustrating to watch and a step backwards in my opinion taking up a starting place .
I hope it's bullshit.
http://readnorwich.com/2017/07/20/norwich-interested-in-re-signing-snodgrass/
Zero chance of him actually getting a game at Chelsea but If the big boys give you an opportunity to sign it would be difficult not to have your head turned.Just seen this - http://www.pinkun.com/norwich-city/...th-premier-league-champions-chelsea-1-5114451
If he feels he wants to leave, there's not much we can do!!!