I don’t understand them. They seriously think he is an average player and that his value should be less because he plays for Leicester and yet they wasted £75mill on VVD.
I put the following points to skylarker to say why we shouldn’t accept less for Mahrez
Attacking players go for more as they are game changers
He has a PFA POTY award that VVD doesn’t
He is coming from a more successful club with more money than Southampton
He has shown he can lead a lower side to a league title than VVD hasn’t
Sky’s arguement that VVD is good business but Mahrez is worth peanuts...because Liverpool needed VVD more. As though how much they need him sets his transfer value

deluded lot